@hokid

0 Followers
59 Following
24 Posts
@jwz I recently wanted to show Björk's "All is full of love" from Chris Cunningham. All HD versions are AI upscaled shit. The original in Björks channel, for some unfathomable reason, is age restricted and requires sign-in. You can't make this shit up. Had to rip my old DVD... never get rid of your old physical media.
@oz1tmm @nixCraft In my experience, all that is ever written this way is yet another static site generator nobody else can use to blog about the Unix philosophy.
@nixCraft Please, just stop using the term "Unix philosophy" as a fetish. There's a ton of great software that does not follow it, and I've seen enough failing init scripts in my life to convince me that endlessly stringing tools together with pipes is not a robust way of writing software.
@aftermath.site I'm assuming you are not aware that Red Bull's founder was a vile bigot and, in that spirit, Red Bull is owner of right-wing media outlets like the Austrian TV channel "Servus TV". It's a deplorable company and you shouldn't advertise their products.
Lorn - Timesink (Official Music Video)

YouTube
The National - "Demons"

YouTube
@itsfoss And you chose to put Omarchy on one, a shitty little distro that's held together by shoestrings and duct tape (see https://マリウス.com/a-word-on-omarchy/) and is made by a vile bigot?
A Word on Omarchy

An in-depth look at the currently trending Arch Linux configuration that is Omarchy.

マリウス
@Weirdaholic @nixCraft Yes, I should have worded this better. I don't think ipv4 is better than ipv6, and in that point, I don't disagree with the article.
@Weirdaholic @nixCraft This is wrong: "But the security benefits people attribute to NAT actually come from the stateful firewall that’s typically bundled with NAT routers." Nowadays, all NAT are stateful and filter according to it. Not sure what you mean with "can be overriden". If you mean features like UPnP, these are not tied to NAT but can (and are) implemented by firewalls as well.
@babor This is not about whether ipv6 is inherently less secure (it is not). This is only about this notion "NAT only does address translation, everything else is firewall". Every NAT implementation out there is stateful and drops packets for which no established connection can be found. This is essentially a "firewall behavior", so it absolutely does provide security benefits.