I had some confusion regarding just which "HR 2616" was just passed today by the US House of Representatives, so for my own records:
What seems to have made it through today is the Rules Committee print of HR 2616, which combines what were formerly HR 2616 and HR 2617 into one bill.
This print requires:
- teachers at schools receiving funds under the ESEA to obtain parental consent (i.e. forced outing) before addressing a student as the gender they state, and
- a ban on "gender ideology extremism" (the bill's words; it is not clear at all how far it goes, though "widest possible applicability" is a reasonable guess) from being taught in said schools.
The print now goes to the Senate.
Y'all know I think both of these changes are bad. I do think y'all should be more concerned about point (2), which is a ban on teaching something that the current administration sees as icky, and which most of US society -- at best -- doesn't see as something worth defending.
I think students will find ways around this should it become law. Banning knowledge makes it cooler, after all, and I have some faith that a significant part of Gen Z and Gen Alpha roll with this stuff just fine.
But I still think you should view this as a live attempt to establish precedent and procedure to take other things from you. Do what you will, or won't, with that thought.