@q66 for some reason the instance doesnt show the constructive criticism i made later in regards to that (I rarely use mastodon) , but yeah you are correct.
https://mastodon.social/@flookerton/112749096366120319

*last statement about setting in stone is exaggerated, tl;dr there's not a "way" explicitly said for a user to take on the modularity of their system, which in some cases like mine resort to speculation or habit. At least now I know that in terms of distributions, user customisation can be enabled by the maintainers in a lot of different ways.

more yapping that doesn't fit the char limit. don't take this personally, my intention is to give constructive criticism in regards to this distribution. Maybe all of the things I'm saying are not in the goals list, and I understand if it is not.

I read through the comments and apparently this is supposed to be removed differently.
Even besides everything, I don't find the implicitness of "what the user preferably should do" while at the same time having an expectation set on that to be comfortable at times, specially when one just wants to remove a text editor and doesn't expect it to be pulled as a system hard-dependency out of all things. This could be helped by a clarification somewhere.
No animosity though, I wanna make that clear.

@q66 I did try this!

@jdrouet @warandpeas Nope. Maybe you're confusing "underwear" with "lingerie".

@warandpeas Sigma

@Toothy It may be better (?)
More attention and stuff.