Riki Fridrich

@fczbkk
7 Followers
6 Following
5 Posts
Som taký dobrý, že som sám sebe vzorom.
I could definitely fall asleep to this Blade Runner-inspired ditty, "a run of rich, lush pad chords with a dreamy, eerie atmosphere" in only ~50 lines of code. https://dittytoy.net/ditty/7d36343a29
Blade Runner pad | Dittytoy

A run of rich, lush pad chords with a dreamy, eerie atmosphere. Also added a few droplets.

Dittytoy
Chápem, že sa vo mne Alza snaží vyvolať pocit naliehavosti. Ale nejako to nefunguje, pretože si myslím, že potrvá ešte dosť dlho, než ten produkt vypredajú.
KFC: "Bude to dvadsať korún, prosím."
ja: "Ale ja som si ešte nič neobjednal."
KFC: "Proste navaľ dvacku a vypadni!"

The #CSSWG just resolved to make the `display` property animatable, with non-`none` values given priority during the transition. It's still discrete - there's no intermediate values between `block` & `none` - but this allows toggling it as part of a transition or animation.

For example (from @flackr) this would become `display:none` when the transition completes:

```css
.hide {
transition: opacity 200ms, display 200ms;
display: none;
opacity: 0;
}
```

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-1318933547

[css-display] Why is display listed as not animatable instead of animation type: discrete? · Issue #6429 · w3c/csswg-drafts

https://www.w3.org/TR/css-display-3/#the-display-properties I thought we were going for discrete for all properties that can't be intelligently interpolated, and that "not animatable" was reserved ...

GitHub