A good editor's response to "I didn't understand this part of your spec" might occasionally be "You need to read this other part first", or "You need to slow down and read more carefully"...
...but most of the time it's "I will clarify it".
A good editor's response to "I didn't understand this part of your spec" might occasionally be "You need to read this other part first", or "You need to slow down and read more carefully"...
...but most of the time it's "I will clarify it".
Me entering my number in a form field: *enters 3 numbers*
Form field: NO NO, that's an invalid phone number
Me: *enters the next three numbers*
Form field: what the hell? NO, this is invalid
Me: *finishes the last four numbers*
Form field: Ohhh I get it now! Yeah that's valid
Send Masonry feedback to https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10233 !
W3C @wai are excited to announce two immediate job openings to join the highly-collaborative international W3C WAI team:
We are seeking an Accessibility Content Specialist, for full-time remote work on digital accessibility materials
We are seeking a Web Technical Specialist, for full-time remote work in the USA, on a project developing the technical infrastructure to support accessibility materials development and delivery.
Just figured this out (thanks @fantasai for the hint): If you're a heavy user of mailing lists (like w3c's) and of Thunderbird, go into the Config Editor, and set "mailnews.headers.extraExpandedHeaders" to "Archived-At".
Now each message that is archived somewhere will let you know where, so that you can quote that and point others to it.
Can you Syntax Highlight a code snippet on the web without overloading the DOM with a ton of `<span>` elements wrapped around the tokens?
Thanks to the Custom Highlight API, you can!