Matrew File

15 Followers
18 Following
1.2K Posts
Lands ravaged, cities in ruins, so many lives sacrificed, and yet there was no other word for it but victory.
Lang/Timezonezh-Hans, en-US-4, pl-PL-1 / +0100
Sitehttps://elfile4138.moe
GitHubhttps://github.com/EL-File4138
Discordhttps://discord.com/users/414995122015436811

RE: https://mastodon.social/@nixCraft/116064423290581819

Meanwhile, we have projects like core-js and xz out there crying for help.

Well I'm not doing anything better ranting here anyway; the Fediverse itself is naturally such a system, small bubble of community based on trust.

Bus station: Segmentation Fault
@yume Solidot是一个三流的信息摘编媒体,即使起内容大部分是原文的复述翻译也有着明确的误导性,这点倒是不意外
原文(卫报的那篇)核心的观点更偏向于marketing manipulation,而非直接论证UPF is bad:
“Gearhardt said it should be possible to distinguish between harmful UPFs and other foodstuffs in the same way that alcoholic drinks are differentiated from other beverages.”
不过我很好奇营养学家认为包装食物的合理营养摄入是什么,欧盟这边有一个简化的五级营养标注,从A到F依次营养价值降低;超加工的即食食品一般都是D或F也就算了,干意大利面是A是什么意思?纯纯碳水也很有营养价值喽?
@yume "work" here is not about intention, as long as it can be used as copyright strike/receiving copyright strike, it is a "work" in the terms of copyright law. And although YouTube never had the desire to be carrying history, it has undeniably become so, as it continues to host countless videos that are definitive to the modern media and culture landscape. If corporate ESG is still of stake, then preserving history fait accompli is undeniably parts of it.

A/B testing of a YouTube video essentially broke a promise that a YouTube public video, once published, becomes a named "work" that can only be retracted but not tampered. It renders the bibliography quotation inaccurate in referencing the name, and is destructive in building YouTube parts of the history of our era.

Shugetsu Ideology - Fifth Principle:
"All pasting present are parts of the irreversible history. Tampering is the most underestimated crime."

@user
Windows: 8MB
MacOS: 26MB
Linux: 87MB

"File transfer don't need to be complicated", so we better make it extra bulky for Linux user
还是 wormhole.app 好,还不用在公共PC上下客户端

@yume Welcome to the hardware world, where everything is behind not paywall, but "intellectual property", sacred objects that's granted by the God of Electronic himself. 🤖
我觉得音乐制作对我来说远比学习工程制作要难的原因是一种对“重复”的否定与否。在工程制作的圈子里,新的学习者对既有制作的模仿和修改是非常受鼓励的(只要引用得当),“再造一个更好的轮子”是一项可以骄傲的创作;而在音乐制作的圈子里,成品与他人的作品“相似”都是会招来质疑与批评的,任何分享与展示都必须建立在成品无可置疑的原创性上。这样对渐进式学习,“站在巨人的肩膀上”的否定很大程度上也是音乐制作者圈层两极分化的原因,这样的社区氛围让“制作人”成为了一个esteemed club,持创作者的审美而自恃,而所有学习者都应当经历的learning curve变成了一个必须抛弃的负资产,只有切割自己的过去才能选择傲慢。
@backrunner 这篇文章和它link的文章在论点上都挺肤浅的。一切都用app做当然大可不必,但把App承载的数据操作剥离出来,个人要面对的Computing问题是一点也减少不了的。你不能只用一个PDF实现Spaced Repetition,你不能只用一个合理大小的MP3文件实现cross-fade mix,你更不能在不设计公式,不设计图表的情况下把记录数据转换为洞察。这都是App所做的,而这篇文章的作者悄然抹掉了这一切。
顺带一提,身处发达地区之外的这群人似乎对网络的robustness太过自信了。Sync is hard,一个BT P2P的解决方案在国内那样对非HTTP恶劣的网络环境还是太naive了。
@yume The first sentence in the thread explained the divergence (sorry for the opinion detour, I just taken the liberty to express what I assumed was more important in the original post). As for the curriculum design, I'll admit that It's also present in Europe, and the low quality mentoring and evaluation are indeed a widespread problem even in critical degree related courses.