Dennis Schubert

@denschub@schub.social
712 Followers
113 Following
692 Posts

firefox web compatibility at mozilla. certified member of the blockchain hate club, and the AI hate club. for science, you monster.

opinions are my own and will stay my own - they're not available for rent or purchase.

pronounshe/him/they/meow
locationStuttgart, Germany
bloghttps://overengineer.dev
contact mehttps://overengineer.dev/me/card/

German "Internet" experts in a nutshell: InterNetX, one of the biggest domain registrars, part of United Internet (the enterprise also owning 1und1) has now introduced their latest "security enhancement":

Automatically expiring passwords.

Almost a decade after the internet world agreed that those are an impressively stupid idea.

I'm so incredibly tired.

I shall start a public shaming list for mail admins who specify a report mail address in their DMARC records and then let those emails bounce. 👿

I'm not even sure if this is @stalwartlabs's fault or Apple's fault, but as a WebCompat person, this bug fills me with a lot of joy. And pain. https://github.com/stalwartlabs/stalwart/issues/1611

(I am so sorry.)

🐛: CalDAV: Using pre-defined colors in Apple Calendar (iOS and macOS) results in multiple `<calendar-color>` tags being stored · Issue #1611 · stalwartlabs/stalwart

What happened? I'm somewhat ignorant as to what the "right" behavior according to any spec is, or even if this is covered by a spec, but since I noticed this "broken" on Stalwart while it worked fi...

GitHub
hey france if you don't stop calling our stations frankfurt gare centrale we'll start calling yours paris ostbahnhof
(the Amazon C3 pun kinda was deliberate, because that Canadian thingie is even hosted on AWS - which somehow makes this even more hilarious.)

why is now everyone hyping that "Canada’s DevOps Platform" company product thingie? that's literally just a hosted Gitea, they just don't say that. and given how much they're trying to hide - or deliberately not mention - the fact that it's just Gitea, they strike me as the kind of company that also don't feel a need to contribute back. according to that company's website, it appears like the "company" also just a single dude, which is kinda the worst thing you could have from a business continuity POV.

that's all around pretty scummy and shady behavior. if Amazon would just set up a Gitea instance using some weird name like "Creative Code Collector" (promoted as Amazon C3 because that's what they love to do), we'd all be - rightfully - trashtalking them. why is this other thing being praised? it's still scummy behavior, it doesn't matter who does it.

if you ever thought you were anxious about your work, try sending a system addon background update to all firefox users. 😐

looking at real-time'ish telemetry data with the percentage of clients with the update installed never gets old.

achievement unlocked: started a chain of train-puns in our public matrix team-channel.

There is finally a complaint against Deutsche Telekom about their, in my opinion, unfair peering practices (in German): https://epicenter.works/content/keine-zweiklassengesellschaft-im-internet-buendnis-reicht-beschwerde-gegen-deutsche-telekom-ein

It's a practice where they're trying to get money not only from their customers, who pay for internet access, but also from online services using very restrictive peering policies. The result is often that networks (and server owners) who don't pay Deutsche Telekom, experience connection issues with their users.

Keine Zweiklassengesellschaft im Internet: Beschwerde gegen Deutsche Telekom

Epicenter.works, die Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte (GFF), der Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (vzbv) und Stanford-Professorin Barbara van Schewick haben bei der Bundesnetzagentur eine Beschwerde gegen die Deutsche Telekom eingereicht. Ziel der Beschwerde ist es, Verletzungen des europäischen Netzneutralitätsgesetzes durch die Telekom zu beenden und die Internetqualität für Millionen von Telekom-Kund:innen zu verbessern.

mails sent to abuse@sendgrid.com currently bounce with

<<< 450-4.2.1 The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate that
<<< 450-4.2.1 prevents additional messages from being delivered. Please resend your
<<< 450-4.2.1 message at a later time. If the user is able to receive mail at that
<<< 450-4.2.1 time, your message will be delivered.

yeah i'm sure this is fine.