@cwebber has a great thread going about the ways the Bluesky can't ever truly be decentralized in any meaningful fashion.
From what I have read about the protocol, I suspected that this was true, and I had a vision in my head of what it would be like if BS was to take off.
This post: https://social.coop/@cwebber/113653422334017644
Says it very well. Bsky will create a pantheon. A very small number of full participants with operational budgets the size of cities, a much larger number of entirely dependent serfs.
Mastodon and the wider activitypub based fediverse isn't perfect, but Christine and the rest of the folks who wrote the activitypub standard created something that could actually support fully distributed operation (where each user can be a full particpant with full control over their experience), as opposed to bsky (which appears to be designed to pay lipservice to user freedom, while actually enforcing a world in which users only have the freedom to choose which fuedal lord they're pledged to.)
Christine Lemmer-Webber (@[email protected])
In other words, the public god's-eye-view allows for a pantheon, but not a civilization. You can only have so many gods who see all. An important characteristic of a decentralized system is scoping what you *don't* need to know. This wasn't in the design goals of ATProto, and it has effects.

