19 Followers
100 Following
383 Posts
Radical pedestrian, urbanist, cyclist

The more of *these* you have where you live, the less you have to worry about the impact the warmongers are having on the global fossil fuel supply.

Sustainability is resilience.

The more you study #parking, the more interesting … and counterintuitive … it is. Example: If you wanted to maximize parking along a residential street, would you: 1. mandate that houses provide off-street parking, or 2. just let everyone park on the street? Right answer: Have no driveways, only street parking. Here’s why. https://vtpi.org/opto.pdf
“House-rich but relationship-poor”: Many families believe more living space will make them happier; it’s why they seek bigger and bigger houses. But happiness isn’t about space, it’s about other people. What does this tell us? If you have a big house and the kids are gone, consider a boarder. Or move to a smaller place where you can have an active social life. https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2026/01/06/smaller-houses-happier-lives/
Column | Why smaller houses can lead to happier lives

It turns out asking “Are you happy with your home?” yields a very different answer than “Are you happy with your life?”

The Washington Post

An interesting interview with the hosts of the podcast @TheWarOnCars and the authors of the upcoming book "Life after cars". They explain among others the origins of the podcast' title (please don't change it, it is just perfect)

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2025-10-17/-life-after-cars-book-makes-a-plea-to-go-automobile-free

There's the habits of highly effective people, and then there's the habits I have.
it’s so humiliating having to push a button to cross the street. why do I have to do that. oh thank you for allowing me to briefly occupy this swath of asphalt with my human body
We need #transit … and we need it to be faster, better and cheaper. But that last part, “cheaper,” is difficult in the U.S. because of a 1964 law that limits how agencies can reduce labor costs, which are a big part of transit budgets. Much of the current crisis in transit funding, a writer argues, can be traced to this one misguided law. https://www.governing.com/management-and-administration/the-1964-federal-law-that-keeps-transit-costs-too-high
The 1964 Federal Law That Keeps Transit Costs Too High

By protecting union labor, it prevents transit agencies from making their workforces more efficient. Privatizing and automating operations would save a lot of money and allow for better service.

Governing
The upside of downsizing: Could the #housing crisis be easier to solve than we think? If so, it’ll be because we have focused on the wrong things. Example: We are intent on building housing for families. Maybe the right answer is … build more housing for seniors. If retirees move from family-size houses to apartments … voila, a lot of family housing becomes available. https://commonwealthbeacon.org/by-the-numbers/kerry-healey-was-right-we-should-discuss-senior-overhousing/
Kerry Healey was right: We should talk about ‘overhoused’ seniors

As a new state commission recommends policies, programs, and investments to expand the supply of housing for seniors, devising strategies to help older adults move into smaller homes should also be on their agenda.  

CommonWealth Beacon
Political movements succeed when interests that usually oppose one another find common purpose in the movement’s aims … often for completely different reasons. Could we be seeing this in state legislative efforts to reform #zoning? This has usually been a Democratic cause, but now Republicans are turning against what they call “snob zoning.” https://www.governing.com/urban/new-hampshire-republicans-crusade-against-snob-zoning
New Hampshire Republicans’ Crusade Against 'Snob Zoning'

The New Hampshire legislature is considering dozens of policies aimed at making housing more affordable, a priority for first-year Gov. Kelly Ayotte. Some policies are gaining bipartisan support, but debates over local control still rage.

Governing
A parking lot where homeless people live in their cars, but only let in if they work in town. Story reflects so many thiings wrong in US:
* Housing shortage so bad that workers with decent jobs can't afford rent.
* Land use & transport systems that make a car more necessary than a home.
* Working class needs a pass from an employer to live in town, an echo of Soviet & Chinese totalitarianism.
* In 2 of 3 towns where tried, nimbys shut down this form of affordable housing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/11/realestate/colorado-homeless-parking-lot-affordable-housing.html?unlocked_article_code=1._E4.b8on.qeAnwZxngK39&smid=url-share
In One Colorado Town, People Experiencing Homelessness Can Sleep in Their Car — if They Have a Job

People experiencing homelessness can sleep in their cars in this wealthy ski town in Colorado, but only if they have a job.

The New York Times