| Blog | https://davek.substack.com |
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/davekleidermacher/ | |
| https://twitter.com/DaveKSecure |
RT @LatinasinCyber
Latinas in Tech Summit 2023 🖥️ May 19th Virtual
Until April 30th, LAIC is hosting a social media competition to qualify for a COMPLIMENTARY pass.
All you have to do is engage with our posts for your chance to win.
moar #protectedcomputing!
🎁 A gift for you: New ways to provide a safer online experience for everyone!
From an #opensource #ML tool that instantly blurs objects to enhanced data encryption, we're committed to continue designing technology that protects your privacy → http://goo.gle/3YJXBfB
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/googledevs/status/1605942494662901771
So true.
The Uncanny Valley of Security - Security Incidents
When you bring transparency to find and fix issues you can look worse that those who don’t even try. Even though your risk, in the end, is less than theirs.
https://www.philvenables.com/post/the-uncanny-valley-of-security-updated
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/philvenables/status/1601939864538095616
Since I first wrote this post 2 years ago I keep seeing it reinforced. The basic premise is that, sometimes, advanced levels of security can look like poor security. Recently Dino Dai Zovi tweeted something which serves to illustrate this: Specifically, on the face of it, the number of 0-days found and resolved can be naively interpreted as a bad thing, in the sense that there are vulnerabilities and they’ve been exploited. But looking at it another way (many of us would argue the correct way) t
