Dan Scolnic

@danscolnic
60 Followers
40 Following
10 Posts
Astrophysics Professor at Duke University

Finally, we examine the mid-infrared backgrounds, which are produced by the glowing observatory. Red and blue are two pre-launch predictions. Black triangles are measurements, black curve is our fit. Green is the zodiacal light, which dominates over the thermal backgrounds for wavelengths <12.5 micron.

Thanks for reading! Here’s the paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09890 We submitted it to the PASP special issue, “JWST Overview”. Constructive feedback welcomed.

paper thread 7/7

How dark the sky: the JWST backgrounds

We describe the sources of stray light and thermal background that affect JWST observations, report actual backgrounds as measured from commissioning and early-science observations, compare these background levels to prelaunch predictions, estimate the impact of the backgrounds on science performance, and explore how the backgrounds probe the achieved configuration of the deployed observatory. We find that for almost all applications, the observatory is limited by the irreducible astrophysical backgrounds, rather than scattered stray light and thermal self-emission, for all wavelengths lambda < 12.5 micron, thus meeting the level 1 requirement. This result was not assured given the open architecture and thermal challenges of JWST, and it is the result of meticulous attention to stray light and thermal issues in the design, construction, integration, and test phases. From background considerations alone, JWST will require less integration time in the near-infrared compared to a system that just met the stray-light requirements; as such, JWST will be even more powerful than expected for deep imaging at 1-5 micron. In the mid-infrared, the measured thermal backgrounds closely match prelaunch predictions. The background near 10 micron is slightly higher than predicted before launch, but the impact on observations is mitigated by the excellent throughput of MIRI, such that instrument sensitivity will be as good as expected prelaunch. These measured background levels are fully compatible with JWST's science goals and the Cycle 1 science program currently underway.

arXiv.org
@AstroMikeHudson Hey Mike, yeah we tried looking at this and didn't see anything obvious. Actually the stricter quality cuts we put on detection, the stronger this signal got.
Grab the data yourself at https://github.com/JiaxiWu1018/Unsupervised-TRGB - I'm sure one can improve the standardization techniques even further.
GitHub - JiaxiWu1018/Unsupervised-TRGB

Contribute to JiaxiWu1018/Unsupervised-TRGB development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub
We also find something really interesting, which is that this contrast ratio correlates with the tip magnitude, at about 5sigma. We discuss a couple ideas about why this might be, maybe it is due to an age correlation (predicted by stellar models), or something correlating with dust. Importantly, it's a powerful component of any analysis to measure the Hubble constant, making things consistent between rungs. That's next for our CATS team :)
We optimize an algorithm that works quite well. We show we can reach as low as ~0.05 mag dispersion across fields per galaxy. That's really good! The catch is that we have to toss a bunch of the fields for not having sharp enough contrast, almost 50%. We actually find that the 'contrast' parameter, which is the number of stars above versus below the tip, is super important, and is basically the key quality cut one can use to get to lower dispersion. #Astrodon #astronomy
We try out a number of different analysis choices in the literature - here is our explainer figure of the different knobs one has to play with.
This is what the Color-Magnitude Diagrams of all the fields in one galaxy look like. You can see, there are clear differences. TRGB is that break one can see with their eye, but it's obvious the slant/color/contrast can all change somewhat field-by-field.
New paper out tonight on using Tip-of-the-Red-Giant-Branch measurements to infer distances: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06354 ! Led by awesome undergrad Jiaxi Wu (an exchange student at Duke), we tried to create an 'unsupervised, standardized approach' to doing TRGB. Basically, in literature, each field of each galaxy has needed some hand-holding, and we try to figure out how to not do that. We utilize the GHOSTS survey where there are multiple fields observed for a single galaxy.
Comparative Analysis of TRGBs (CATs) from Unsupervised, Multi-Halo-Field Measurements: Contrast is Key

The Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) is an apparent discontinuity in the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) along the giant branch due to the end of the red giant evolutionary phase and is used to measure distances in the local universe. In practice, the tip is often fuzzy and its localization via edge detection response (EDR) relies on several methods applied on a case-by-case basis. It is hard to evaluate how individual choices affect a distance estimation using only a single host field while also avoiding confirmation bias. To devise a standardized approach, we compare unsupervised, algorithmic analyses of the TRGB in multiple halo fields per galaxy, up to 11 fields for a single host and 50 fields across 10 galaxies, using high signal-to-noise stellar photometry obtained by the GHOSTS survey with the Hubble Space Telescope. We first optimize methods for the lowest field-to-field dispersion including spatial filtering to remove star forming regions, smoothing and weighting of the luminosity function, selection of the RGB by color, and tip selection based on the number of likely RGB stars and the ratio of stars above versus below the tip ($R$). We find $R$, which we call the tip `contrast', to be the most important indicator of the quality of EDR measurements; we find that field-to-field EDR repeatability varies from 0.3 mag to $\leq$ 0.05 mag for $R=4$ to 7, respectively, though less than half the fields reach the higher quality. Further, we find that $R$, which varies with the age/metallicity of the stellar population based on models, correlates with the magnitude of the tip (and after accounting for low internal extinction), i.e., a tip-contrast relation with slope of $-0.023\pm0.0046$ mag/ratio, a $\sim 5σ$ result that improves standardization of the TRGB. We discuss the value of consistent TRGB standardization across rungs for robust distance ladder measurements.

arXiv.org
Got to talk here about how the Roman Space Telescope will search/discover kilonovae: https://hubblesite.org/contents/news-releases/2022/news-2022-049 #Astrodon
How NASA’s Roman Telescope Will Scan for Showstopping Explosions

HubbleSite.org
New paper out led by Duke undergrad Ava Bailey and postdoc mentor Maria Vincenzi: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01206 . Paper poses a question - how useful can Euclid be for SN Ia cosmology considering it's just designed for LSS probes. Turns out with deep fields, they have repeat observations, then long gaps, but those repeats can be quite useful. We show this would really boost LSST constraints, and independently help solve one of biggest mysteries of SNe Ia. And would be great Roman prep. #Astrodon
Type Ia Supernova cosmology combining data from the $Euclid$ mission and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory

The $Euclid$ mission will provide first-of-its-kind coverage in the near-infrared over deep (three fields, $\sim$10-20 square degrees each) and wide ($\sim$10000 square degrees) fields. While the survey is not designed to discover transients, the deep fields will have repeated observations over a two-week span, followed by a gap of roughly six months. In this analysis, we explore how useful the deep field observations will be for measuring properties of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). Using simulations that include $Euclid$'s planned depth, area and cadence in the deep fields, we calculate that more than 3700 SNe between $0.0<z<1.5$ will have at least five $Euclid$ detections around peak with signal-to-noise ratio larger than 3. While on their own, $Euclid$ light curves are not good enough to directly constrain distances, when combined with LSST deep field observations, we find that uncertainties on SN distances are reduced by 20-30% for $z<0.8$ and by 40-50% for $z>0.8$. Furthermore, we predict how well additional $Euclid$ mock data can be used to constrain a key systematic in SN Ia studies - the size of the luminosity 'step' found between SNe hosted in high mass ($>10^{10} M_{\odot}$) and low mass ($>10^{10} M_{\odot}$) galaxies. This measurement has unique information in the rest-frame NIR. We predict that if the step is caused by dust, we will be able to measure its reduction in the NIR compared to optical at the 4$σ$ level. We highlight that the LSST and $Euclid$ observing strategies used in this work are still provisional and some level of joint processing is required. Still, these first results are promising, and assuming $Euclid$ begins observations well before the Nancy Roman Space Telescope (Roman), we expect this dataset to be extremely helpful for preparation for Roman itself.

arXiv.org