Dani Barca ⛵️

@danibarca
11 Followers
65 Following
102 Posts
Studying games. Doing games. Playing games. Hi from Barcelona

BTW I’m writing in Spanish too, now

I started writing in English because this language was a large part of my life, I wanted to improve my writing and I liked the idea of being seen as someone who communicates in English. I have a feeling that lots of people reach my blog through my LinkedIn profile, so it's also a bit of a competitive advantage in Spain, where most people have big difficulties to speak English.

http://danibarca.com/2026/02/17/btw-im-writing-in-spanish-too-now/

BTW I’m writing in Spanish too, now

I started writing in English because this language was a large part of my life, I wanted to improve my writing and I liked the idea of being seen as someone who communicates in English. I have a fe…

Daniel Barca

No compres para cumplir objetivos

En la vorágine consumista en la que nos encontramos, es muy habitual que se nos presenten productos o servicios como una solución a una carencia personal. Nos autoexigimos: no conseguimos leer un libro por semana, o entrenar 4 veces por semana, o estudiar tanto como deberíamos, tomar notas, escribir un diario, llevar una dieta equilibrada... Para todas estas cosas el mercado nos promete soluciones rápidas y efectivas.

http://danibarca.com/2026/02/16/no-compres-para-cumplir-objetivos/

No compres para cumplir objetivos

En la vorágine consumista en la que nos encontramos, es muy habitual que se nos presenten productos o servicios como una solución a una carencia personal. Nos autoexigimos: no conseguimos leer un l…

Daniel Barca
@dank @grumpygamer @claudius as I said they are massively different technologies so comparing them has its limits. I wasn’t trying to draw an absolute parallel between them, my point is that every tech sucks when it’s in development. Also I didn’t mean millions at any given time, but Steam is not representative of VR usage.
@dank @grumpygamer @claudius oh, I’m so sorry I had to make you repeat yourself. Touchscreens are not useful per se, everything that can be done with one, can be done with a mouse too. VR is at least as useful as a touchscreen but there’s a big entry barrier as it requires the commitment of wearing a big device that blocks your view. Screens are a lot more accessible as of today but that doesn’t make them more useful.
@dank @grumpygamer @claudius I think it is short sighted to dismiss a tech that hasn’t fulfilled its potential, just because a few mega corporations have been bullshitting a bit too much with it.
@dank @grumpygamer @claudius and millions of people use VR as of today. VR is a massively more complex tech than touchscreens. Only in the last decade we started having the compute power and capabilities to make them minimally usable. We haven’t yet seen any version of VR that provides a good user experience. No matter how long VR has been around, it is today what touchscreens were in the 90s: disappointing, not quite there, but with potential.
@[email protected] @thomasfuchs I try different browsers but after getting used to Arc there’s just no going back. Zen is the only alternative out there. It’s improved a ton in the past couple months.
@the5thColumnist @grumpygamer @claudius touchscreens is how people want to interface with their devices nowadays (like it or not).
@grumpygamer @claudius describing VR on those terms is like saying "touchscreens suck, they're dead" after trying out a 90s PDA. There's tons of potential on VR, it's just not ready.