Attempts to justify SOLID, or the works of Bob Martin, etc. are reminiscent of revisionist reinterpretations of the Bible or the US Constitution.

We have an aversion to claims of originality, preferring to cite ancient wisdom. But it's become clear that these rules that have been handed down are widely misinterpreted, and literal readings of them often lead to bad code.

Rather than writing essay-length explanations and analyses of their original intent, maybe just come up with better rules?

Whoa, huge #IndieDevSales event happening tomorrow and Wed for iOS, Mac, and sometimes other platforms. Full list here: https://github.com/mattcorey/indie-dev-sales

#Apple #Mac #iOS #apps #GoGetEm

40% off 1 year of my preferred nutrition tracker, @foodnoms, right now with code PRIMEDAY2023

Lots of others too:

https://github.com/mattcorey/indie-dev-sales

I can't get over how fractally bad a take this is. Like, aside from the obvious.

"Most fun product of the year" - it's a Twitter clone. That launched yesterday.

"Because their own elected officials…" - so basically if we accept the premise that this law is bad, it's cool to collectively blame all EU citizens for laws their leaders pass and mock them for any harm it causes them? This is coming from a *fucking American*?!

"Have fun in the library" - WHO DOESN'T WANT TO HANG OUT IN A LIBRARY?

George: And see when I turn the knob-
Jerry: You can't see me?
George: I can't see you!
Jerry: You can't see me!
George: I'm standing in a beautiful sunlit river basin
Jerry: You know I went rafting for $100 last summer, it was beautiful, and you paid-
George: This is the FUTURE Jerry, and you're not here, because I'm standing in a beautiful sunlit river-

<door slams>
<Kramer slides in, wearing a headset>

Kramer: I'm an app developer, Jerry