I may have controversial opinions, just a chill guy otherwise.
🇮🇳
| Pronouns | He/Him |
| Birth | 7th April |
| Telegram | https://t.me/clot27 |
| Github | https://github.com/clot27 |
I may have controversial opinions, just a chill guy otherwise.
🇮🇳
| Pronouns | He/Him |
| Birth | 7th April |
| Telegram | https://t.me/clot27 |
| Github | https://github.com/clot27 |
February in Servo…
⏯️📜 pause and resume in DevTools
🤏🖱️ Pointer Events API
🧲🪟 <button command>
🔰🎨 ‘@property’ and ‘:modal’
📦🌐 better JS modules support
So, Bluesky is getting more crypto VC money, more AI, and a full year of steadily declining activity.
https://bluefacts.app/bluesky-user-growth
While the fediverse is getting quotes, UX/UI improvements, starter packs.
Hm!

Whenever a user, a government, a school or a business chooses the format in which to store and exchange its digital documents, it is not merely making a technical decision, but is placing a bet on the kind of digital infrastructure on which it will depend in the future. In this sense, ODF and OOXML are not two equivalent options on the same shelf, but two radically different solutions: one geared towards a future of openness, interoperability and digital sovereignty, and the other towards a past of defending a vendor’s dominant market position through user lock-in. ODF: designed to be open and transparent Open Document Format was conceived from the outset to be an open standard. It was designed and developed by the community under the auspices of OASIS, and subsequently ratified by ISO, to be implemented by anyone, on any platform, without royalties, without hidden dependencies and without the permission of any single company. These are not trivial technical details, but a statement of political and economic strategy embedded within the format itself. ODF is based on a clean XML schema, easy to read even by non-technical users and reusable. Colour naming follows standard web conventions, and its architecture
~/Downloads folder