@dnaka91 @chrisvest The only advantage I see is being easier to integrate with Bazel. Other than that, I totally agree with you 😊
clementjean
- 0 Followers
- 2 Following
- 9 Posts
Data format geek and Udemy instructor
@dnaka91 @chrisvest I would have preferred a pure implementation like the go or csharp one. This looks like a wrapper, that's why it's close to the C++ API.
@endocrimes I used traefik (https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/user-guides/grpc/) In the past, was pretty happy with it. Hope that helps.
@bignose @Amirography I would argue that an API is clearer in gRPC though. You just looked the services definitions and you have documentation plus type definitions. I hate going through a REST API documentation that not well documented or outdated. At least this never happens in gRPC or other schema based RPC Frameworks.
@allenu sounds like an interesting project, let me know if you need help
@markrendle good one 👏
@coderbyheart You can probably save a little bit more but I need to try to be sure. Having a repeated field on a complex type has some overhead. Furthermore, if you wanted to simply human readable text you could use the protobuf text format. Let me know if you want to know more.
@kpfaulkner you could try using https://ghz.sh/ to do load testing. I would be interested in the result 🙂
@digitalpebble I have experience with gRPC Go. Would be happy to discuss about it