0 Followers
26 Following
9 Posts
@evacide Suddenly LLMs hallucinating makes more sense.
@tracketpacer Your networking is officially out of this world! Massive congratulations.

@malwaretech I recently watched your video about the CUPS issue and I believe there's content that could cause some confusion to less technical users.
You mentioned that binding a port to 0.0.0.0 meant it could be reached by any IP and if it was bound to 127.0.0.1 it would be local only. It's my understanding that 0.0.0.0 is a wildcard and on this instance means "all IP addresses in the system". Binding a port to an RFC1918 IP wouldn't limit access to an IP outside of the range used if the routing and port forwarding it in place to route the traffic.

You would only block traffic to a service if a firewall in the data path (on the OS or inline along the flow) limits the source IP, or if the service has the ability to limit connection sources when the service is configured.

I hope you can take this input in the spirit it's intended as I follow you because I respect your knowledge in areas I'd be absolutely lost in. And hopefully this is also a direct message to inform rather than a reply aimed at calling you out.

@GossiTheDog Is this Microsoft pushing heavily to finally make the year of the Linux desktop a reality?
@JenMsft Our cat likes to paddle in water in the sink or the bath. He would jump in and then shout at us to start the water and he'd spend 20 mins or so dipping his feet in and splashing about.
@GossiTheDog the EICAR test string

@hacks4pancakes When I had a gap between internet providers I used a similar WiFi extender to connect to the hotspot on my phone to use cell data and connected that into the WAN on the router to allow everything internally to carry on working without any reconfiguration.

When you're in a hole Jank is beautiful! I'm glad you managed to sort something to keep you going. I'm sure you fully deserve some time off.