neurospicy i like this word! š
(and i somehow do not dislike it that it takes me ages to choose a fitting emoji ⦠every š¤ single š time š )
only allow this to happen if the surrounding area also hasnāt been interacted by anyone else (maybe like a 5x5 around the pixel) to be undone by the eraser
Whatās the reasoning for this? One of my use cases would have been that I had started to draw something then realised that someone else was drawing next to me, so Iād wish I could have a way to quickly move my thing out of the way. Another one was with a collaboration on a template and in the end trying some adjustments because the template was unsharp. Which was essentially overdrawing other peopleās pixels just to see how it looks, then perhaps reverting some of those.
Iām not OP, and I learned about AS only through this community but didnāt investigate further (different continent). So I can only speculate: thereās a lot of revenue to be made from therapy and pharma if you find a new niche. A fundamentally wrong popular bias, reinforced by pouring massive money into advertising helps that a lot.
To me it also smacks a lot like a part of that post-humanism psy-op. Some (influential) people really want to have āBrave New Worldā become reality (or āGattacaā?) ā the āperfectā human machine; engineered and gated; divergence is a flaw. The rest goes happily with the narrative. There was someone posting their dismay about an interview with a person they previously liked, maybe already a year ago. The person in the interview was speaking of how autism should get removed from the gene pool ā¦