| work | https://accr.org.au |
| bird site | https://twitter.com/brynnobrien |
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/brynnobrien/ | |
| pronouns | [she/her]/[they/them] |
| work | https://accr.org.au |
| bird site | https://twitter.com/brynnobrien |
| https://www.linkedin.com/in/brynnobrien/ | |
| pronouns | [she/her]/[they/them] |
shoutout to the cool people learning new skills for a safer future.
brave and necessary rn to pick up unfamiliar disciplines! climate scientists leaning about comms, portfolio managers learning climate science, communicators learning portfolio theory, etc etc: i see you 💕 🤓🙏
when evaluating protest action, i consider the following questions:
- do i agree with the ultimate objective the protest action is seeking to advance?
- does the action (in the cold light of day, seen as objectively as possible) effectively advance the objective?
- does the action seek to minimise harm to everything but the ultimate target of the protest?
would love to hear others’ ideas
Hell — new A Rational Fear podcast is out now.... and it includes a great chat with @brynnobrien about the battle for the AGL board: