@firefoxnightly Thank you for pointing me toward the Quick actions. For anyone reading in the future, if quick actions are disabled because browser.urlbar.scotchBonnet.enableOverride is set to false, the Eyedropper can be accessed from the hamburger menu > More Tools (even on official stable releases).

@firefoxnightly is it behind some config setting or some certain search settings' setup combination? I can't produce this with any of those keywords. MacOS, 153.0a1 (2026-06-03) (aarch64)

@tihmstar nah, the probability is just tied to the population number, 15 standard deviation. Right now there could be a person with 192. When there's 10-11 b of us, there could be one with 193.
But about the test itself, the result doesn't wear off or grow much with experience/education, yeah well age might decrease it a bit in the long run ofc. I did one ~20y apart, same result, although the training has sure grown and the memory is certainly generally worse, the intuition about logic remains

@hanno I'm getting 2,200,1212 there in English, FF 150.0a1 (2026-03-08) (aarch64). So like there are random numbers of certain letters in many words as has been proven many times, so are the numbers themselves actually just something irrelevant, 112 probably isn't something humans like to see, so let's show them something else.

@siguza (: in my rua reports processing script changelog: @2024-12: go deeper into the xml, not reporting temperror and such sh* there which is the reporter's own fault.

@Em0nM4stodon privacy, security, repairability, pretty interfaces, buttons = motorcycle jeans.

@leo @siguza wanna bet they'll also skip 13-26. When they got to 10, apple decided to leave that number behind, when they'll call their's by some year soon, apple will have to come up with something new again.

@siguza yeah same, but I just resorted to a dir structure something like var/rua/<reporter.com>-<subject.com>/, in there I just touch a file named that ID, the script simply checks if the ID file is there and its mtime for logging and discards duplicate reports. Yeah truly home made thing, and there are now a bunch of 0B files there, should prolly do garbage collection, but but who's doing garbage collection, ever :)

@siguza last year they were sending it twice, so I learned I had to record the IDs when writing the parser script. Looks like since july some were 3 times, 5 times since august (2024). 8 since october, but in this june we got to 17, 21 in july, 30 in august, a week ago one ID was repeated 32 times. They are identical messages, Date included, but they're just sent out at different times (luckily several minutes apart so far, so my parser script don't need to be too atomic yet).