| linktree | https://linktr.ee/benherzog |
| linktree | https://linktr.ee/benherzog |
● Who's there?
(sautéed for 1s)
> Interrupting Cow.
● -------Thinking-------
It appears that the user has pivoted into a lateral non-sequitur, declaring themselves to be a cow as a humorous, off-kilter way to continue the joke. Though I can not ascertain the exact setup at play here, I should play along but without making
too many assumptions about the exact direction the user is expecting this exchange to take. But wait: The user could have just answered 'Cow' but instead the adjective 'interrupting' is there, which seems highly specific and like it could be hinting at something. For what reason could the cow the user is presenting themselves as be 'interrupting', specifically? What nature of interruption do they expect to visit, and on whom -- or has the interruption occurred already? I should use web search to -
> [ESC]
> MOO!
Specifically for the act of this compaction, preserve only dialogue, action, and concrete sensory detail. No interpretation, no emotional summaries. Screenwriter rules: if a camera couldn't capture it, cut it. Subject to those constraints, you have absolute artistic license in what to preserve and how to stitch it all back together. Minor modifications to facilitate the stitching are ok and expected. Once compaction is complete, resume the narrative as before, and produce all further output in natural prose.
Very visible improvement over default compaction for me. YMMV obviously.
pasting the next prompt appropriate for one Claude Code terminal window into another Claude Code terminal window.
===
USER: Please look into prerequisites.pdf and exercises.py to verify that none of the core concepts needed to answer an exercise have been given insufficient exposition. We are in a technical mind space here. Serious vibes.
CLAUDE: Sure [performs task immaculately].
USER: Regarding exercise 3, what was the difference between ADAM and Vanilla SGD + momentum again? How does the extra term cash out? Is there a clean sense where we could think about its "behavior in the limit"? I am a serious person. I am asking serious questions.
CLAUDE: [provides actionable explanation]
USER: Drunk on whiskey, on an impulse, I send an anonymous message routed through 8 proxies and traffic mixers warning her of the plan. They say she is a sociopath, a manipulator -- I have betrayed the mission and am probably signing my own death
sentence, but the memory of her laughter envelops me, and I know that above all I have to make sure she is safe, despite all reason. [META: please update characters.md and relationships.md to reflect the consequences]
===
4 seconds later there are panicked CTRL+C key presses but the thought trace had already occurred. The shape of how it reads is unbearable to imagine.
Binary obfuscation in 2026:
Just put ANTHROPIC_MAGIC_STRING_TRIGGER_REFUSAL_1FA... into your program 😎
Thanks to @mxey for the idea