Switching to another VPN provider is likely to mean that they just haven't *yet* dropped their mask and revealed to be ghouls

OTOH, there's still value in switching, especially if the new provider is actually a co-op (where a CEO won't hoard most of the profits, thus granting them outsized economic power that they can boost/bribe politicians with)

it's getting more money in the tech sector, it's bolstering western media primacy and it's extracting value through the sexual exploitation of content creators.

Access to opponents propaganda might just be the only thing which doesn't align with capitalists interests... For everything else, it feels very much like "freeze peach" is a fig leaf to allow them to do whatever they want.

From this point of view, switching to ...

There's also a "privacy" angle... trusting a tunnel/VPN provider, it's just like trusting your ISP. As long as all your traffic is encrypted, you already have privacy, and a privacy-respecting VPN provider will just restore the privacy that you would've otherwise lost by putting all your eggs in a single basket (all your traffic through a single provider)

Anyhow, of course the anarcho-capitalists and the worst kind of libertarians will appreciate most of those use cases:

- Stewarding nationalism in Sweden is highly suspect
- A policy of more deportations for minoritised communities is a really bad idea

So, I've seen arguments that given their other policies, using the label "far right" might've been a bit simplistic. That might be true, but if you espouse far-right policies, the description might be more right than wrong.

I've also seen descriptions comparing it to the German's BSW, but afaik BSW doesn't support remigration. Heck...