RT @MassiveStarGuy
The paper was accepted by the Astrophysical Journal last week, and we've posted it here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14147 To me, this will always be my "pandemic paper"--I struggled with this for many, MANY more months than I would have under more normal circumstances. But we got there!
The Time-Averaged Mass-Loss Rates of Red Supergiants As Revealed by their Luminosity Functions in M31 and M33
Mass-loss in red supergiants (RSGs) is generally recognized to be episodic,
but mass-loss prescriptions fail to reflect this. Evolutionary models show that
the total amount of mass lost during this phase determines if these stars
evolve to warmer temperatures before undergoing core collapse. The current
Geneva evolutionary models mimic episodic mass loss by enhancing the quiescent
prescription rates whenever the star's outer layers exceed the Eddington
luminosity by a large factor. This results in a 20 solar-mass model undergoing
significantly more mass loss during the RSG phase than it would have otherwise,
but has little effect on models of lower masses. We can test the validity of
this approach observationally by measuring the proportion of high-luminosity
RSGs to that predicted by the models. To do this, we use our recent
luminosity-limited census of RSGs in M31 and M33, making modest improvements to
membership, and adopting extinctions based on the recent panchromatic M31 and
M33 Hubble surveys. We then compare the proportions of the highest luminosity
RSGs found to that predicted by published Geneva models, as well as to a
special set of models computed without the enhanced rates. We find good
agreement with the models which include the supra-Eddington enhanced mass loss.
The models with lower mass-loss rates predict a larger fraction of
high-luminosity RSGs than observed, and thus can be ruled out. We also use
these improved data to confirm that the upper luminosity limit of RSGs is log
L/Lo~5.4, regardless of metallicity, using our improved data on M31 and M33
plus previous results on the Magellanic Clouds.
arXiv.orgRT @MassiveStarGuy
Arguably, the greatest uncertainties in modeling the fate of massive stars is what to assume about the mass-loss rates during the red supergiant (RSG) phase, as most of the mass is lost episodically. @KathrynNeugent and I plus other collaborators tried a different approach.
RT
@astrogradyI'm very excited to share my and my collaborator's work analyzing the environments and spectra of a population of super-AGB stars we previously identified. The paper came out on the arXiv Wednesday!
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12438 Paper thread below, with a quick recap of Paper I!

Cool, Luminous, and Highly Variable Stars in the Magellanic Clouds. II: Spectroscopic and Environmental Analysis of Thorne-Żytkow Object and Super-AGB Star Candidates
In previous work we identified a population of 38 cool and luminous variable
stars in the Magellanic Clouds and examined 11 in detail in order to classify
them as either Thorne-Żytkow Objects (TŻOs, red supergiants with a neutron
star cores) or super-AGB stars (the most massive stars that will not undergo
core collapse). This population includes HV\,2112, a peculiar star previously
considered in other works to be either a TŻO or high-mass AGB star. Here we
continue this investigation, using the kinematic and radio environments and
local star formation history of these stars to place constraints on the age of
the progenitor systems and the presence of past supernovae. These stars are not
associated with regions of recent star formation, and we find no evidence of
past supernovae at their locations. Finally, we also assess the presence of
heavy elements and lithium in their spectra compared to red supergiants. We
find strong absorption in Li and s-process elements compared to RSGs in most of
the sample, consistent with super-AGB nucleosynthesis, while HV\,2112 shows
additional strong lines associated with TŻO nucleosynthesis. Coupled with our
previous mass estimates, the results are consistent with the stars being
massive (~4-6.5M$_{\odot}$) or super-AGB (~6.5-12M$_{\odot}$) stars in the
thermally pulsing phase, providing crucial observations of the transition
between low- and high-mass stellar populations. HV\,2112 is more ambiguous; it
could either be a maximally massive sAGB star, or a TŻO if the minimum mass
for stability extends down to <13 M$_\odot$.
arXiv.orgRT @NASAHubble
Coming soon to a screen near you! ⭐
Starting on Monday, join us for two weeks of *stellar* star cluster content! New Hubble images, videos, and more are headed your way.
Get ready to explore #StarrySights from Hubble! Get ready here: https://go.nasa.gov/3ALBoDs

Discoveries - Hubble's Star Clusters
NASA.gov brings you the latest images, videos and news from America's space agency. Get the latest updates on NASA missions, watch NASA TV live, and learn about our quest to reveal the unknown and benefit all humankind.
NASART @ArcticSaxifrage
This week on the PVL blog, MSc student Madeline Walters recaps the methane debate on Mars so far and discusses some recent developments:
http://york-pvl.blogspot.com/2022/11/whats-going-on-with-methane-on-mars.html
What’s going on with methane on Mars?
This week, Madeline discusses a critical component of her research into how methane is vertically distributed in the martian atmosphere. Rea...
@Stef_Astro Thank you so much for your kind comment Stephane! Yes, I'm also looking forward to DR4 and what new information we'll get from it!
Finally the thread art was created by my wonderfully skilled friend @astromadelinew! I asked not for scientific accuracy but instead art that shows how I feel about my work and the stars I study; gleaming red jewels of light on a celestial SMC. The very bright one is HV2112!
If you're interested in learning more, please check out the full paper
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.12438! You can also reply/message me here, or (preferred) e-mail me at
[email protected]. Thanks for reading! Here's another Jupiter!

Cool, Luminous, and Highly Variable Stars in the Magellanic Clouds. II: Spectroscopic and Environmental Analysis of Thorne-Żytkow Object and Super-AGB Star Candidates
In previous work we identified a population of 38 cool and luminous variable
stars in the Magellanic Clouds and examined 11 in detail in order to classify
them as either Thorne-Żytkow Objects (TŻOs, red supergiants with a neutron
star cores) or super-AGB stars (the most massive stars that will not undergo
core collapse). This population includes HV\,2112, a peculiar star previously
considered in other works to be either a TŻO or high-mass AGB star. Here we
continue this investigation, using the kinematic and radio environments and
local star formation history of these stars to place constraints on the age of
the progenitor systems and the presence of past supernovae. These stars are not
associated with regions of recent star formation, and we find no evidence of
past supernovae at their locations. Finally, we also assess the presence of
heavy elements and lithium in their spectra compared to red supergiants. We
find strong absorption in Li and s-process elements compared to RSGs in most of
the sample, consistent with super-AGB nucleosynthesis, while HV\,2112 shows
additional strong lines associated with TŻO nucleosynthesis. Coupled with our
previous mass estimates, the results are consistent with the stars being
massive (~4-6.5M$_{\odot}$) or super-AGB (~6.5-12M$_{\odot}$) stars in the
thermally pulsing phase, providing crucial observations of the transition
between low- and high-mass stellar populations. HV\,2112 is more ambiguous; it
could either be a maximally massive sAGB star, or a TŻO if the minimum mass
for stability extends down to <13 M$_\odot$.
arXiv.orgThe spectra were an essential cornerstone of the paper, and we would never be able to capture and understand this starlight without the tremendous expertise of the telescope operators and staff at @LCOAstro. Special thanks to the fantastic Nidia Morell!
Thank you @emmabeasor @emsque @MassiveStarGuy @jobovy Ben Davies, Nancy Remage Evans, Chris Matzner, Krzysztof Stanek Dennis Zaritsky, Dan Kelson, Jennifer Liang, Adiv Paradise & Aushi Singh for helpful discussions; @TanaDJoseph @MFilipovic23 & @naomimcgriff for radio data access.