I'm a cancer biologist who is concerned his research won't benefit patients because climate change will undermine the future sophisticated society required.
I'm also interested how synthetic biology (a research focus) can be used for long-term CO2 storage.
The cartoon in this article might well be describing Isabel Oakshott’s perspective on climate change, but I suspect the belief that “money = brains’ is a more fundamental misapprehension.
Davos as a venue for launch of a climate report by a business consultancy!
Is it any surprise that it concludes ‘relatively small policy interventions on electric cars, plant-based alternatives to meat and green fertilisers’ are ‘super tipping points’ offering ‘plausible hope’ for a rapid green transition in time.
Reminded me of this Climate Delayer (thanks to @jks and colleagues)
A shocking charge sheet on broken environmental promises.
UK Government response: “Hey ChatGPT, write me a self-congratulatory puff piece with out of context numbers and UK international leadership.”
ChatGPT: “No problem”:
The Finance Industry talks about the need for an ‘orderly transition’ to justify continued fossil fuel finance.
But a glance at the increasing steepness of CO2 reduction rates each year makes it clear that their Greenwashing supports short term profit and disorder.
