| Research lab | https://themesolab.com |
| Personal website | https://braumoeller.com |
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZW-QEygAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra |
| Pronouns | He, him |
| Research lab | https://themesolab.com |
| Personal website | https://braumoeller.com |
| Google Scholar | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ZW-QEygAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra |
| Pronouns | He, him |
I taught Mearsheimer this semester, then followed it with 3 formal theory articles (1 each rational choice, ABM, system dynamics) that begin with broadly similar assumptions and arrive at starkly different conclusions. It’s a great exercise.
See also https://osf.io/kep5b on the implications of lack of rigor in verbal models.
From: @scottwolford
https://mastodon.social/@scottwolford/109994479359507785
Late to the game, I suspect, but I hadn’t spotted this until now. With Tufte-style footnotes, no less. What a neat idea!
“arXiv Vanity renders academic papers from arXiv as responsive web pages so you don’t have to squint at a PDF.”
https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/ #politicalscience #socialscience
Fantastic answer to the question, “What do politics have to do with me?”
Eyepopping Bret Stephens column, summarizing a new study, argues (as the headline flatly states) that “Mask Mandates Did Nothing.” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/21/opinion/do-mask-mandates-work.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
Click over to the study itself and read that existing observational studies are flawed in ways that make it difficult to know whether masks did anything to slow spread of disease. (One example: Many people ignored mandates.)
Those are… really, really not the same thing.