@Sustainable2050 Calling the comic surface level as hell, explaining it to us, then explaining that you don't get it - is funny for reasons I can't explain.
Just because you answered yourself with 'yes' doesn't mean it's true. (Or that it makes sense) 😆😆😆

@MxVerda @Sustainable2050
"Alright, accurate or not, it's surface-level as hell, and the implication is that the reader is not or should not be doing what is depicted, yes?
Which means the predicted audience is people who understand themselves as not included in the comic. "Quoting
Which is it? An implication that the reader is not (which means is not doing the thing) or should not be (which means they are doing it)
It's unlikely that the comic displays both ideas.

@MxVerda @Sustainable2050
No, no, I definitely understood that you don't really get it. Thank you for expanding, though.

@MxVerda @Sustainable2050
Felt pretty accurate to me. I've seen this scenario play out all around me.
It's a little weird to discredit the perspectives / experiences of others because you disagree.

@apodoxus @Sustainable2050
That's a fair point. We are merely losing the illusion of democracy.
I thought more people would care about that. This is really solid logic though. About to be an interesting decade.

@Sustainable2050 Why is this so accurate and nobody here cares?!