It seems to me like a ploy to shift the responsibility of unethical trading of personal data to the users. By giving us a "choice", they try to appease those who are most concerned with the ins and outs of social media business models, while for many paying remains unreasonable 🙄 4/4

I am not saying that these platforms absolutely shouldn't be subscription based, maybe that is the only answer to safeguard users in the lack of public social media. But it shouldn't be presented as a choice in exchange for making profit from data many don't fully grasp. And with absolutely no added value that could make paying the fee make sense. 3/4

You may say, "well, it seems like the value is 149kr" but is it? A fixed amount is too arbitrary to give anyone any indication of ad revenue which fluctuates based on user behaviour. Many users won't see the point in paying for something they don't truly understand. 2/4