It’s a bad conclusion because I think that calling for people to be killed is immoral? You have a perverse sense of morality if you truly believe that.

I know you’re just trolling, but at least try to make it believable. I didn’t “start too many chats.” I made one post criticizing a man openly calling for murder, and it was all of you who “started chats.” If you don’t like being called out for your calls to violence, you have the option of not making calls to violence, but to dismiss legitimate criticism is just childish. And it doesn’t really matter which corner you want to say that you’re fighting in; at the end of the day you’re still justifying killing, which I find morally contemptible. But again, you live your corrupt, hateful, violent little life the way you want to (“brain-rotty”, to borrow your phrase)

Lol, moral judgement from the guy cheering for the murder of innocents. Please just go spend some time on yourself before you talk shit about others. Just because you’re corrupt doesn’t mean that everyone to speak to must also be as corrupt as you.

Woah, which is it? A moment ago it was objective truth, now it isn’t? Can’t quite make up your mind about what you believe? Almost like you’ve been talking nonsense the whole time?

There’s a lot of people who can’t understand that the book and the author are different things.

It’s not a word, but I really hate the phrase “today years old”

It is absolutely not the objective moral position, but I think that you already know that. The Israelis will say that there is an objective reality that can be seen in the Palestinian butchery of Israeli citizens and that “it is both the relative and objective moral position to fight against Hamas and Palestine in general. And currently that requires violence as they are in a state of war and will kill those that oppose them. “DEATH TO PALESTINE” is like a warcry, it’s not supposed to be a rhetorical position, it’s a call to inspire and motivate the resistance against Palestinians and genocide”

Wow, look how easily your supposedly objective truth turned out to be completely subjective to your preexisting biases.

Ah, “the truth”, or your version of it anyway.

This is a rather surprising turn, as you know seem to be abandoning your previous claims about relative morality and now declare that their killing is objectively moral? Of course, you don’t really believe that, as you’ve made abundantly clear. It’s not really surprising that you abandon your position so easily since it was disingenuous to begin with, but you’d think that the fact that you are now directly contradicting yourself should at least alert you to the fact that you hold dissonant beliefs.

I’m sure the Israelis will also say that it would cause more death and suffering to allow Palestine to continued unopposed, so you’re still left in the same position as before, Buddha or Bodhisattva notwithstanding.

Another attempt to shift the goalposts by putting words in my mouth. The plain fact of the matter is that you are calling for people to be killed and endlessly trying to justify that call to killing, and in my book that makes you a hateful, violent, and most importantly evil person.