[Video] BBC cuts away during pro-Palestine musicians Kneecap. The followup act Bob Vylan invents a new chant on live TV

https://lemmy.world/post/32207492

[Video] BBC cuts away during pro-Palestine musicians Kneecap. The followup act Bob Vylan invents a new chant on live TV - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

What a hateful person.
I feel like wishing people who are purposefully murdering children would die is not hateful and actually a pretty moral stance
I feel like wishing people to die at all is a pretty immoral stance, but you obviously have your own version of morality where killing people is justifiable, so you do you I guess.

So in your mindset, there’s zero point where killing is “justifiable”?

I’m legitimately asking here.

In a perfect world, people would respect boundaries, not start war, or genocides to further their own beliefs.

What do you propose people facing extinction do? Parlay?

That’s a lot of words to avoid acknowledging your own moral corruption for openly calling for people to be killed. Go troll someone else, you hateful, violent prick.
Jesus, those are some thoroughly piss-soaked chips you’ve got there, petal.
Wow, if that’s an attempt at a coherent thought, you’ve got a long way to go.
Your ability to admit you don’t understand it is a big step. Now you just need to address your previous commenters in the same light, with the questions you’ve been asked and are too afraid to answer. We believe in you, champ.
Nice attempt at trolling. Try not cheering for people to be killed before you get up on your high horse.

Ahhhh, I get it. No instances of me cheering at the death of others, so the other party has to fake the argument. Petty, and a pity.

Come now, you’ve started discourse with others, you really ought to answer their questions.

You’re literally in a thread about a guy cheering for the death of others and you’ve decided to troll the guy saying that killing us morally wrong. How can you say this shit with a straight face?

Saying that killing is morally wrong, or saying that an individual is hateful, is a nothing sentence. It’s not an opening of discourse or planet brained insight. When asked a follow up, to elucidate, you assume the position of actors and extol your own virtue by putting down the rest.

It’s nout but antagonism for the purpose of whysoever a troll would do anything. Getting jollies off by calling high horse, or moral corruption.

You make playing in the shit look like fun, and then feign upset when others join you.

Lol, moral judgement from the guy cheering for the murder of innocents. Please just go spend some time on yourself before you talk shit about others. Just because you’re corrupt doesn’t mean that everyone to speak to must also be as corrupt as you.

Come now. When people say strawmanning, they tend to mean that someone has taken the time to at least turn a pile of straw into the shape of a man but you can’t even be arsed to do that. Just standing next to it and calling it a man is even sadder.

You started too many chats and feel like you need to argue them all but you can’t even remember who said what.

“Anyone not fighting my corner is for the murder of innocents” Sounds a bit brain-rotty, fella. A tad corrupt.

I know you’re just trolling, but at least try to make it believable. I didn’t “start too many chats.” I made one post criticizing a man openly calling for murder, and it was all of you who “started chats.” If you don’t like being called out for your calls to violence, you have the option of not making calls to violence, but to dismiss legitimate criticism is just childish. And it doesn’t really matter which corner you want to say that you’re fighting in; at the end of the day you’re still justifying killing, which I find morally contemptible. But again, you live your corrupt, hateful, violent little life the way you want to (“brain-rotty”, to borrow your phrase)