0 Followers
0 Following
1 Posts

What about Israel or Trump behaviour makes you think they choose actions for the reasons YOU see as rational? Why do you presume their goals are ones you agree with (mutual self interest?)

People that believe “zero sum game” consider situations like: “we” lose half, but we make everyone else lose 3/4 = “we” win, so they would totally do that

The lack of a general strike is telling. Everyone everywhere faces hardship, but other places would have, long ago (like you should have under Regean long ago!)

Your billionaires know most of you are scabs and class traitors, they will not stop now.

Put up or shut up.

Cause, how?

USA gonna actually, really, seriously, irrevocably, cut Israeli arms supplies? If Israel crosses THAT line (again, after every other line)?

Even if now they will (they wont) but even if, why would Israel believe them? Why would Iran trust them?

Da
“It was real. I’d seen it. I’d seen it in reality.” • The mask of humanity fall from capital. It has to take it off to kill everyone – everything you love; all the hope and tenderness in the world. It has to take it off, just for one second. To do the deed." And then you see it. As it strangles and beats your friends to death… the sweetest, most courageous people in the world." “You see the fear and power in its eyes. Then you know. That the bourgeois are not human.”
They call him TnT, cause when he goes off, someone’s gonna get hurt…

Watch “Chernobyl” by HBO, if u old enough to remember that, at the time it was all lies and cover ups.

I did a deep dive into reactors in general and concluded:

Even with “better, safer (theory 100% safe)” reactor designs are vulnerable to fail (sometimes catastrophically) given

1)external(Social, energy) pressure: 3Mile, Chernobyl, Fuck-You-Shima, all were entirely preventable BUT given “social” pressures (whether capitalist, communist or zibatsu) there is always pressure to do things “cheap”

2)all reactor designs, when off line, need (sometimes up to 2 years!) of cooling to avoid disasters. This means when you wanna turn off, they are massive long term energy vampires. Thusly: all reactors, given social collapse, where there is not freely available staff and surplus power, red line, sometimes to meltdown. So plagues, war, catastrophe, social breakdown… all over the world…

3)“safe” reactors are designed so for 50 years. They are then “unsafe” but it takes years and billions$ to shut them down (and you need to replace capacity!). A vast number of original power plants are past or passing threshold. To my knowledge, no political system pre banked the money and resources to shut and replace. So we are just patching cracks, and operating less safely (there will be a bunch of these disasters in next decades)

?What kind of idiot lights a fire that you can not extinguish, and can not leave unattended!

Watch “All watched over by machines of loving grace” BBC, Curtis; might be also on some dread YouTube. The cow portholes were part of (unexpected) scientific disproof of the trite popular wisdom of “Ballance of Nature.” Whole series is a trip, if maybe a bad one.
Through the darkness of future past The sorcerer yearns to see One clear path between two worlds Come fire, walk with me
In the old sitcom “Happy Days,” after far too many seasons, a new episode featured The Fonz, blue screen water skiing, a crappy looking shark prop, and the Fonz literally jumped over the shark.