I mean, I’m no fan of Roberts nor the current SCOTUS, but this isn’t a ruling on the merits, but a stay on the reinstatement by the lower court.

Still shitty, just more nuanced than the headline suggested.

Oh, so you can’t identify a single thing I said that was disproven by or incongruous with the content in the article?

You know, you should just give it a read, it’s not that long 🤙

Ok, smart guy, since you assume I didn’t read the article:

tell me what I was wrong about.

The system that he wants to change has come up with a way to prevent him from trying to change it? I’m shocked /s

This won’t end well

You posted the meme: which “democratic” election are you talking about?

To be fair, “representative democracy” isn’t exactly what the US is experiencing at the moment.

Between the gerrymandering, the lack of ranked choice voting, the unlimited spending allowances by Congress (they could write a law limiting spending by private corporations and declare corporations “not persons”, but have not done so), which keeps the two party system afloat, it’s an insult to “representative democracy” to call the current system in the US such a name.

“This message brought to you by those that sat out of the last election and directly caused all of this chaos”

GTFO with this nonsense

Okay, my interpretation may be incorrect ¯\_(ツ)_/¯