@thelinuxEXP Creators of information or content could license the end user using the AI as a tool (like a can opener) to open the information or content and unlock its potential for private use only. Example: the end user would be responsible for buying the content license for a book and for buying a license for using the AI. The. The user could instruct the AI to read the book and provide a summary for the sole and exclusive use of the user. All interaction cataloged/tracked by blockchain.

@ProPublica when “side a” wants to use race as an advantage, but “side b” doesn’t allow them, “side b” is called “racist” under the “side a” defacto standard. Then the matter is decided by a judge or set of judges that are nominated or voted onto the bench by either a “side a” or “side b” politician or electorate which are influenced by either “side a” or “side b” news and information. This imperfect system rests on freedom of speech.

@arstechnica Just went swimming in the Caribbean last week and the water was exceptionally chilly. Felt like about 68f. Much colder than normal Caribbean temps.

@ProPublica Requiring $464mm to access your constitutional right to appeal is the real crime here. It’s a violation of the 8th amendment, read and weep; https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/supreme-court-confirms-excessive-fines-clause-applies-to-states