JournalofElectronicPublishing

106 Followers
113 Following
98 Posts
Open access, scholarly communications journal for research about contemporary publishing practices. Co-edited by Alyssa Arbuckle @alyssaarbuckle + Janneke Adema @openreflections supported by @UofMPress
Websitehttps://journals.publishing.umich.edu/jep/

Reminder…: Consider submitting to our forthcoming special issue on The Future of Diamond Open Access: Possibilities, Perils, and Pathways. CfP available here:
https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/jep/news/239/

We invite broader discussion on Diamond OA and its future(s), from the highly conceptual to the deeply infrastructural. What is next for Diamond OA as it oscillates between the potential for either a technocratic or community-led and commons-based future?

Abstracts due March 23rd 2026. #DiamondOA

Call for Papers: Special Issue on The Future of Diamond Open Access: Possibilities, Perils, and Pathways

Abstract submission deadline: March 23rd 2026 In recent years, Diamond Open Access (OA) has risen to the fore in the ongoing exploration of which knowledge production models are both ideal …

Michigan Publishing
New Call for Papers alert! Consider submitting to our forthcoming special issue on The Future of Diamond Open Access: Possibilities, Perils, and Pathways. CfP available here: https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/jep/news/239/ Abstracts due March 23rd 2026. #DiamondOA
Call for Papers: Special Issue on The Future of Diamond Open Access: Possibilities, Perils, and Pathways

Abstract submission deadline: March 23rd 2026 In recent years, Diamond Open Access (OA) has risen to the fore in the ongoing exploration of which knowledge production models are both ideal …

Michigan Publishing
Finally, Jeff Pooley @jpooley considers the predominance of textuality in scholarly communication; a reality reflected in JEP’s own historical corpus, which is primarily (although not exclusively!) text based: https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.8757 [5/5]
The Modal Mode of Thinking about Scholarly Publishing

The essay argues that the study of scholarly communication would benefit from attending to a “modal” sensibility—that is, a self-conscious sensitivity to the differences that different mediums make in understanding published works of scholarship. The essay critiques the unreflective textualism that dominates the conversation on publishing. The claim is that the primacy of text, as the sovereign medium of academic communication, is a largely invisible parochialism. The essay points to examples and traditions of multi-modal publishing as an entry point to taking the medium-specificity of publishing formats as an object of analysis. Such experimentation has followed, sometimes closely, the emergence of new mediums of storage and transmission within the societies that scholars work. The mid-twentieth century birth of the modern medium concept made multi-modality a conceivable, self-conscious project. Even so, the discourse on academic publishing has rarely registered the implications, including for inherited text-based formats. The essay concludes with a call for media scholars, curiously underrepresented in the discourse, to take up this task, with reference to pioneering works in the field.

The Journal of Electronic Publishing
John Maxwell @jmaxsfu telescopes into the Books and Browsers moment, an era that JEP engaged by publishing proceedings from that conference: https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.8294 [4/5]
On the Books in Browsers Moment

The Books in Browsers conference ran from 2010–2016; JEP published its proceedings in its heyday. In those days -- in the wake of the Kindle's launch and the new EPUB standard -- many of us were hugely enthusiastic about the open field of possibilities; Books in Browsers and JEP reflected much of that enthusiasm. The publishing world, however, unfolded in different ways that we'd imagined.

The Journal of Electronic Publishing

Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri @boukacemzeg provides a historical reflection on JEP’s trajectory over the past few decades, and the ways in which her own work has intersected with the journal’s over time:

EN: https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.8761
FR: https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.8311
[3/5]

<em>The Journal of Electronic Publishing</em>: Serving Academic Communities for Thirty Years 

The anniversary of an academic journal is always an important moment, for the publication itself, for its editorial committee, and for the community of researchers and professionals that has formed around it and that thrives on the texts it publishes. Such a milestone allows us to take a step back and appreciate how much has been achieved, the work that is currently underway, and what remains to be done. 

The Journal of Electronic Publishing
In JEP 28(3), co-editors Alyssa Arbuckle @alyssaarbuckle & Janneke Adema @openreflections reflect on editorship in “Valuing the Role of the Editor: Now and in the Future” and dig deeper into an ongoing consideration of AI and editorship: https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.8758 [2/5]
Valuing the Role of the Editor: Now and in the Future

None

The Journal of Electronic Publishing
We are excited to announce the publication of our JEP 30th Anniversary Special Issue, comprising reflections from our editorial board and edited by Alyssa Arbuckle @alyssaarbuckle and Janneke Adema @openreflections ! https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/jep/issue/439/info/ [1/5]
Pssst… it’s our birthday! Happy 30th Birthday, JEP! 🎈

The Journal of Electronic Publishing (JEP) has announced the publication of their new special issue on #Publishing and #ClimateJustice, edited by Janneke Adema.

This important collection captures urgent and critical research that starts to outline the challenges the climate emergency poses to the publishing sector. The issue asks: What is the role and responsibility of the publishing industry in tackling #climate change? The contributions to this issue all share a desire to further the dialogue about climate (in)justice in scholarly publishing, highlighting the paucity of research on this topic. But they also offer real examples of ways in which scholars, #publishers, #libraries, #universities and infrastructure providers can start to make meaningful change in this context.

Please share this special issue with anyone in your network who may be interested in Publishing and Climate Justice!

Contents: https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/jep/issue/386/info/

Volume 28 • Issue 2 • 2025

The Journal of Electronic Publishing | Issue: Issue: 2(28) Publishing and Climate Justice (2025)

This is a thought-provoking great piece

Worthington, S., Yadav, G., Murray-Rust, P., Kumari, R., Hegde, S. & Bhadra, P., (2025) “Climate Justice in Electronic Publishing: A New Approach Supporting Global South Participation”, The Journal of Electronic Publishing 28(2). https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.7206

@JEPub @mrchristian #OpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing #ClimateCrisis

Climate Justice in Electronic Publishing: A New Approach Supporting Global South Participation

This article argues that the ways in which scholarly electronic publishing is currently carried out is inherently a climate injustice as it unnecessarily hinders participation by people from the Global South in the climate science discourse, which is further exacerbated by the reliance of publishers on PDF-oriented system architectures. We argue that mega-publishers and societies are responsible for the state of electronic publishing and hence for the resulting climate injustice. A new publishing model for electronic publishing is proposed, informed by the semantic web, hypermedia, and the software system designs of earlier technological visionaries who built and promoted global access to knowledge through granular indexing and linking. This new type of publishing remains unsupported in mainstream scholarly publishing, which renders the knowledge it contains almost unnavigable, especially in complex, fast-moving research domains such as climate science. We are members of the #semanticClimate open research group, led by young Indian scientists, and together we are working to implement this new model for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) climate reports. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) is the most authoritative summation of climate change scientific knowledge and influences the acknowledgment of climate justice globally in policy for addressing climate change. As do other research bodies, the IPCC uses conventional electronic publishing workflows (centered on the PDF), but this holds back its potential wider reach. Our research intends to demonstrate how such reports could be made more accessible. The research we present in this article includes a semi-automated literature search on the topic of “climate justice” and asks the following questions: What does the open access scholarly corpus know about this topic, and what is the shape of the discourse as it exists in this literature? In which papers and journals has the topic appeared, and reaching back several decades, how often have the term and related terms been mentioned? We will also demonstrate the open-source tools that we will use for future work to create the Climate Knowledge Graph (ClimateKG), which aims to make the IPCC report globally accessible. The research presented in this article covers an experiment carried out by the #semanticClimate team, which focused on searching and computationally retrieving the open access scholarly research corpus from Europe PubMed Central (6.9 million open access papers) as well as all 70 chapters of the AR6 held on GitHub as HTML with IDs. The outcome of this experiment is a first-round scoping exercise to create the Climate Justice Dictionary, which represents terms associated with climate justice collected from this open scholarly corpus over 20 years as well as from the IPCC report.

The Journal of Electronic Publishing