Pete H  CISSP/ISO27K

190 Followers
260 Following
338 Posts
Cybersecurity Shepherding, therapy and consulting/Veteran/Mental Health First Aider/Veteran Advocate (Work for me so toots are mine)
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/peterhillier/

Cyber strategy spends a lot of energy defending systems.

But the real security decisions happen earlier — in engineering and procurement.

Systems Security Engineering might be the missing piece. https://medium.com/@pjhillier/the-missing-link-in-cybersecurity-strategy-systems-security-engineering-in-defence-procurement-e916c1a8cc67

The Missing Link in Cybersecurity: Strategy: Systems Security Engineering in Defence Procurement

Abstract

Medium

This wasn’t the deal.

Strength means protecting your own.
That’s not politics. That’s just common sense.

A strong leader is supposed to insulate the people who stand behind him, not expose them.

You can see the difference when you look at leaders who treat stability and protection as their primary job. Take Mark Carney. Whether people agreed with every decision or not, his role was clear:
reduce risk, steady the system, and shield ordinary people from unnecessary shock.
No theatrics. No blame games. Just protection.

That’s what leadership looks like when it’s doing its job.

Now compare that to what many supporters South of us were told they were signing up for:
• the pain would hit competitors, not families at home
• disruption would be strategic and temporary
• ordinary people would be protected
• loyalty would matter

That was the deal.

But if policies were supposed to hurt others and instead raised prices, increased risk, and landed costs on the people who trusted them… then something broke.

That doesn’t mean anyone was stupid.
It doesn’t mean bad intentions.
It just means the outcome didn’t match the promise.

You’re allowed to notice that.

You don’t owe lifelong loyalty to any politician.
You don’t owe silence when the costs land where they weren’t supposed to.
And reassessing a bad deal isn’t betrayal; it’s judgment.

Support is conditional.
Trust has to be earned.
And loyalty doesn’t mean defending failure—it means expecting protection.

No outrage.
No labels.
Just outcomes.

Three gents, one from BC, another from Ontario and the third from Newfoundland, are traveling together on Xmas eve. They crash, die and go to heaven. Met at the gates by St Peter, he says in order to get in you’ll have to show me something representing Xmas. The guy from BC pull out matches and light one and explains this is a candle of hope. St Pete says you’re in. The 2nd dude, digs out his keys and says these are Xmas bells. First nd your spot inside says the big guy at the gate. The Newf, who’d been fumbling around through his pockets the whole time, finally pulls out a pair of panties. St Pete exclaims, what are those? Newf says, these are Carols’s.

America is turning 250… and decides to celebrate by proving they learned absolutely nothing.”

So for the 250th anniversary of the United States, Donald Trump proposes:
• A nationally staged youth competition
• Two teenagers per state
• Heavy symbolism
• Televised patriotism
• Ideological purity tests
• And a vibe that screams ‘Rome, 2nd century AD’

And we’re supposed to clap because it’s called Patriot Games instead of Authoritarian Youth Olympics.

Branding matters.

Let’s Strip the Costume Off This Thing

This isn’t about athletics.
This isn’t about unity.
This isn’t even about patriotism.

This is state-sponsored spectacle replacing civic meaning.

When a country can’t talk honestly about:
• its institutions,
• its failures,
• its contradictions,
• or its future,

…it starts throwing parades at the idea of itself.

That’s not celebration.
That’s avoidance with fireworks.

Why Teenagers? Be Honest.

Because teenagers are:
• emotionally resonant
• politically symbolic
• easier to moralize
• and can’t vote against you yet

Nothing says “freedom” like using minors as ideological props.

This is what happens when a movement runs out of policy and switches to casting directors.

Hunger Games Much?

Not hyperbole. Structural.

One boy. One girl. From each jurisdiction.
National capital.
Elite event.
Winner narrative.
Heavy symbolism.
Loyalty theater.

The only difference is the soundtrack and the merch table.

And when critics point this out, the defense is:

“Relax, it’s just sports.”

Right, and the Olympics were just track meets in Berlin, 1936. Context matters. Intent matters. Power always matters.

🛐 + 🥊 + 🇺🇸 = ????

A prayer rally.
A UFC fight at the White House.
A state fair on the Mall.

This isn’t governance; it’s a playlist for people who confuse dominance with strength.

It’s not a republic at 250.
It’s a midlife crisis with a flag code violation.

The Most Damaging Part?

It trains people, especially young people, that:
• citizenship is performance
• patriotism is conformity
• dissent is disloyalty
• complexity is weakness
• and history is something you chant over, not learn from

That’s how democracies rot without a coup.

Not with tanks.
With applause.

This Is the Line That Should Terrify Everyone

When a nation celebrates its founding without teaching its principles,
when it replaces reflection with ritual,
when it chooses spectacle over substance,

…it’s no longer commemorating history.

It’s auditioning for myth.

And myths don’t need citizens.
They need extras.

America didn’t survive 250 years to become a halftime show. It survived because it argued, corrected itself, broke things, rebuilt things, and occasionally listened.

Turning the semiquincentennial into a nationalist talent show isn’t patriotic. It’s the sound a republic makes when it’s scared to look in the mirror and decides to flex instead.

The new U.S. NSS reshapes Canada’s position in North America — and most Canadians won’t see the shift until it’s already in motion.
The document quietly reframes our sovereignty, our resources, and even the roles of Canadians working inside U.S. defence and industrial systems.
It’s subtle, but strategically dangerous.

https://medium.com/@pjhillier/when-partnership-turns-hierarchical-what-the-2025-u-s-79d526a6f167

#Canada #Geopolitics #NationalSecurity #ForeignPolicy #NorthAmerica

Everything Trump touches dies.
The struggle on those urban training grounds is real.

But also? Why the fuck should I have to respond to that implication anyway? What does "not being sad Charlie Kirk is dead" have to do with "advocating for political assassinations?" I'd be just as happy if he'd choked to death on a McGriddle.

The very implication that not performing sadness for a dead nazi who wanted to literally put me in a fucking camp, is somehow a radical, VIOLENT, left wing position, is itself, fascist propaganda.

We could just not accept the terms of discussion.