Mastodawn

Can’t you just block the number? Or do they use a lot of different numbers.

Well… As the “country” screaming the loudest about democracy. It’s hard to conflate the two. But seeing the terrible voting system over there, I guess that wouldn’t be fair.

So what is the lesson exactly? Start your career by scamming/guilt-tripping your parents out of money? Not really sure what else I should take away from this.

I see, I always assumed it was either people giving their info themselves or others did to prank you. I guess it makes sense for a country who loves perpetual war.

Wait, this a real thing? That’s so… American I guess.

Let’s encrypt doesn’t have to be accessible from the web, it accesses the web itself. It’s a subtly difference i guess, but you don’t need port forwarding or anything. Of course if your jellyfin/immich net is completely blocked from going out on the internet then it still won’t work.

as far as I know, there is no way to put a valid certificate like let’s encrypt for a service that is not accessible from the net

I don’t think that’s true. But Let’s encrypt does need to verify the domain name. If it’s just a domain you made up in your LAN that is an issue yes. But I have no experience with that though.

You could use self-signed certificates, they are free. but you would need to add custom trusted CA to all the user devices manually. I’ve never done this myself so no clue how troublesome this really is.

What I do is have a reverse proxy that requests a wildcard certificate (e.g ‘*.example.com’) with Let’s encrypt. And then route all my services through the reverse proxy with subdomains. You can get free domains with duckdns.org or others.

I think it’s probably more of Got drunk > Got into a fight because drunk > Got even drunker > Signed up because even drunker.

Signed up because they had some fight with a girl? At least they didn’t lose any mental capacity in Russia by losing these guys.