Can you conjure up some compelling proof AI is actually any good at this? Because my experience with literally anything I know well enough to provide my own summary of is that it’s just about certain to be hilariously incorrect.

“Chatbot like LLMs” as if that doesn’t encapsulate LLMs entirely.

They’d have to pay ME to use their bullshit, and it wouldn’t be cheap.

…what profits?

That mom needs to get slapped with charges and rot in jail, but we all know she’ll just toss up a GoFund me and hit the nutty grifter circuit.

Every time - every single time - I’ve purchased a major AAA game anywhere close to the release window in the past 10 years, it’s been a mistake. Pay a shitload more for a half baked, buggy, unfinished mess.

At this point I just don’t buy big time releases within 6 months of launch. Even when I’m certain of the game itself, it just ends up being a mistake.

Because the most evil people on the planet are universally convinced that they’re heroes.

…said some dumbass executive, while masturbating furiously at the fantasy.

They don’t all do this, though - research seems to use imaging and other observational techniques, self reporting isn’t the only source. Brain imaging is one, and I know they’ve demonstrated variance in automatic pupil responses to back up self report. I think they have also used it as a research control in other studies after that, but I don’t know a ton about it.

This is what I remember reading, I think, and that…advocacy? awareness?..site also has a decent running collection of assorted research. Seems like it’s not very well understood or studied, which makes sense when it doesn’t really affect behavior or quality of life.

something something her emails something something