its about all of us here on Lemmy

And yet, i just see you bitching about it. Were you elected to speak for me? I don’t recall that.

You must be fantastic at Community volunteer efforts/work. /s

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

Snowflake, if you don’t like the article headline the author used, downvote and move on and email the author. Cripes, not everything is about you sweetheart.

No, its not about me, its about all of us here on Lemmy, and the quality of posts we get.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

The post title is an exact and faithful copy of the linked article, though. There’s no editorializing here.

That’s one of my points. They could have changed the title of the Lemmy post (like what is done MOST of the time around here) to not match the subject of the article but instead be accurate for us Lemmy readers, and not just duplicate the same/wrong title. The “editorializing” in this case is the NOT correcting of the title in the Lemmy post.

So either the person who posted here on Lemmy didn’t read the article they posted about, or they decided to purposely carry forward the invalid title from the article, after having read the article. (Or, this is just an astroturfing article and we are all wasting our time commenting here.)

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

I’m pretty sure he’s a sov cit. Don’t bother trying to reason with him.

No, I pay my house taxes, and drivers license fee, and my car registration, etc., etc., etc.

Weak attempt.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

From the article …

Organic solar cells have lagged behind their silicon-based cousins for energy-producing purposes due to engineering challenges such as low efficiency and short lifespans, but recent work out of Forrest’s lab has achieved record efficiencies of 10% and estimated lifetimes of up to 30 years.

Years are made of months … Good read en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month

More than just a good read, that’s one of the project/programming Ten Commandments.

Can’t tell you how many times over the decades I’ve had to argue with project managers about that.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

This, A.K.A. “me too”.

I’d be will willing to hear any suggestions of what app features the web browser does not have to make it worthwhile installing an app. ??

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

On Monday, Washington’s Metropolitan Police revealed that two people accused of vandalizing a Tesla windshield will be charged for “political hate speech.”

Not to be pedantic, and to be fair, but it is political speech. It’s definately not complaining about customer service or warranties.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

The title of the post matches the title of the article, this isn’t a case of a poster editorializing.

I’m going to call b.s. on that one. I read the article. And so did others.

Edit: From the comment I initially replied to…

The article’s title does not match the content.

And how you replied to me replying to the above …

The title of the post matches the title of the article

I’m talking about the body of the text of the article vs its title, the same as the person that I replied to. I don’t care about the ‘red herring’ assertion you are making.

And while we are at it, the article title doesn’t match the body of the article itself.

I get how you want to ‘Kill the Messenger’ and diminish my rep here, but don’t be so literal/pedantic, and goal post moving.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

The article’s title does not match the content. I read it and it does not talk about how Musk controls Trump. It talks about retaliation for those organizing protests against Tesla.

Welcome to Lemmy, where people’s personal agendas/marketing shape the titles of their posts.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~