The article’s title does not match the content. I read it and it does not talk about how Musk controls Trump. It talks about retaliation for those organizing protests against Tesla.

The article’s title does not match the content. I read it and it does not talk about how Musk controls Trump. It talks about retaliation for those organizing protests against Tesla.

Welcome to Lemmy, where people’s personal agendas/marketing shape the titles of their posts.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

The title of the post matches the title of the article, this isn’t a case of a poster editorializing.

The title of the post matches the title of the article, this isn’t a case of a poster editorializing.

I’m going to call b.s. on that one. I read the article. And so did others.

Edit: From the comment I initially replied to…

The article’s title does not match the content.

And how you replied to me replying to the above …

The title of the post matches the title of the article

I’m talking about the body of the text of the article vs its title, the same as the person that I replied to. I don’t care about the ‘red herring’ assertion you are making.

And while we are at it, the article title doesn’t match the body of the article itself.

I get how you want to ‘Kill the Messenger’ and diminish my rep here, but don’t be so literal/pedantic, and goal post moving.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

Call BS? What he said is literally, explicitly true: If you click on the article, that’s the title of it. OP didn’t change the title to fit an agenda, he used the article’s title.