Cliff Burgess

248 Followers
132 Following
506 Posts
Theoretical particle physicist and one helluva guy.
Review of “The Standard Model: A Primer” (Burgess and Moore, Cambridge Press 2007, 2012)“About attraction, unbridled energy and the world of international models. Not at all standard.”
Review of “Introduction to Effective Field Theory” (Burgess, Cambridge Press 2020)“Best use of fields since the Agricultural Revolution.”
Some of my coordinates@CburgesCliff (and Twitter) or https://physics.mcmaster.ca/~cburgess
Metric signature-+++ (don’t settle for less)

RT @[email protected]

Some solid physics today on #TheLifeScientific on @[email protected]. My guest is the fantastic Clifford Johnson @[email protected], renown expert on string theory and black holes as well as advisor on Hollywood sci-fi movies. Forget Dr Strange - I give you... Professor Weird.

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/jimalkhalili/status/1620332457966047234

Jim Al-Khalili on Twitter

“Some solid physics today on #TheLifeScientific on @BBCRadio4. My guest is the fantastic Clifford Johnson @asymptotia, renown expert on string theory and black holes as well as advisor on Hollywood sci-fi movies. Forget Dr Strange - I give you... Professor Weird.”

Twitter
Amazing Astronomy on Twitter

“Scientists believe they have discovered a portal to the Fifth Dimension https://t.co/JPJ96Pgu8J”

Twitter

RT @[email protected]

(insert here) = quality journals.

Having been in my field for 20 years I can't think of a single piece of important work published in either Nature or Science.

@[email protected] has some good stuff but also publishes a lot of the worst papers, hype written for cites. https://twitter.com/DrBrianKeating/status/1619827721554767872

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/JosephPConlon/status/1620064930534936576

Prof. Brian Keating on Twitter

“But Eric, we already did that. We have ‘a small number of high quality journals, with strong editors’ embedded in a vaster sea of lower impact factor journals with weaker editors. E.G. @Nature @ScienceMagazine @PhysRevLett ++embedded in a sea of (insert here). No need to reinvent”

Twitter

This, in physics too 👇

RT @[email protected]

The best new ideas always have unanticipated benefits. So it's stupid to require people who want to do new things to enumerate the benefits beforehand. The best you can do is choose smart people and then trust their intuitions about what's worth exploring.

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1619753568264921089

Paul Graham on Twitter

“The best new ideas always have unanticipated benefits. So it's stupid to require people who want to do new things to enumerate the benefits beforehand. The best you can do is choose smart people and then trust their intuitions about what's worth exploring.”

Twitter

Still too soon…

RT @[email protected]

Happy National Croissant Day!
Flaky, golden, buttery, sweet steaming croissants. That is all.
#thegoodlifefrance

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/lifefrance/status/1619939482958200832

The Good Life France on Twitter

“Happy National Croissant Day! Flaky, golden, buttery, sweet steaming croissants. That is all. #thegoodlifefrance”

Twitter

RT @[email protected]

What advice would you give to a mentee who has just started meeting with a mentor?

#NationalMentoringMonth

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/argonne/status/1619785725024534534

Argonne National Lab on Twitter

“What advice would you give to a mentee who has just started meeting with a mentor? #NationalMentoringMonth”

Twitter

Me to students: “Sure. Use any metric signature you want.”

RT @[email protected]

How to Speak Cat.

How do you say "I'll kill you when you fall asleep"?

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/VergaraLautaro/status/1619841392397934593

Lautaro Vergara🏑 🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘 on Twitter

“How to Speak Cat. How do you say "I'll kill you when you fall asleep"?”

Twitter
Roland Pierik ([email protected]) on Twitter

“No glasses needed. I have eyes.”

Twitter

Yes it is.

RT @[email protected]

I think the fundamental problem here is thinking that you can measure transformational ideas with publication metrics. https://twitter.com/Nature/status/1618533624885698563

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/WKCosmo/status/1618630548079140872

nature on Twitter

“Editorial: Is science really getting less disruptive — and does it matter if it is? https://t.co/5loF2RVdWp”

Twitter

RT @[email protected]

One fact that surprises a lot of people is that the US *government* spends a *larger* fraction of its GDP on healthcare than the Canadian government does. Private citizens also pay much more.

The free market provides a lot of things well, but healthcare isn't one of them.

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/matthewgburgess/status/1619784180824694784

Matt Burgess on Twitter

“One fact that surprises a lot of people is that the US *government* spends a *larger* fraction of its GDP on healthcare than the Canadian government does. Private citizens also pay much more. The free market provides a lot of things well, but healthcare isn't one of them.”

Twitter