𝖀𝖑𝖙𝖗𝖆 𝕲𝕱 π•Ώπ–—π–Žπ–˜π–π–†πŸ‡

@CCym
0 Followers
10 Following
14 Posts
🎡 Spectralist/Noise-Enthusiast studying Psychoacoustics 🎢 | 🎹 Aspiring Dungeon Synth Artist 🎹 | 🚬 Queer Pessimism & Invariant Dogmatist. 🚬 | πŸ’… She/Fae πŸ’…

Chaya Raichik put in her personal twitter bio that she identifies as a stochastic terrorist, but after the CO Springs terror attack, she quietly changed it to include quotation marks.

She knows what she is and what she’s doing.

https://web.archive.org/web/20221117034619/http://twitter.com/ChayaRaichik10/

Chaya Raichik (@ChayaRaichik10) / Twitter

Creator of @libsoftiktok. Stochastic terrorist. β€œabsolutely f****** garbage” - German Government. cry/more/libs

Twitter

Photos 5&6: π‘«π’Šπ’‡π’‡π’†π’“π’†π’π’„π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 π‘Ήπ’†π’‘π’†π’•π’Šπ’•π’Šπ’π’ by Gilles Deleuze (pg. 270&271)

Photo 7: π‘«π’Šπ’‚π’π’π’ˆπ’–π’† 𝒐𝒏 π‘΅π’†π’˜ 𝑺𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒆 by Carl Schmitt (pg. 21)

Photo 8: π‘΅π’π’Žπ’π’” 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑬𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒉 by Carl Schmitt (pg. 43)

Photo 1: π‘«π’Šπ’‡π’‡π’†π’“π’†π’π’„π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 π‘Ήπ’†π’‘π’†π’•π’Šπ’•π’Šπ’π’ by Gilles Deleuze (pg. 2)

Photo 2: π‘·π’π’π’Šπ’•π’Šπ’„π’‚π’ π‘»π’‰π’†π’π’π’π’ˆπ’š by Carl Schmitt (pg. 13)

Photo 3: π‘·π’π’π’Šπ’•π’Šπ’„π’‚π’ π‘»π’‰π’†π’π’π’π’ˆπ’š by Carl Schmitt (pg. 36)

Photo 4: π‘·π’π’π’Šπ’•π’Šπ’„π’‚π’ π‘»π’‰π’†π’π’π’π’ˆπ’š by Carl Schmitt (pg. 15)

As such, not only must Nomos be abolished, but the queer identity will eventually have to undergo its own self-overcoming, self-abolition, or self-abandonment.

If one fails. BOTH fail.

It may even be comforting to have a romantic view of the pirate considering the direct link society has placed in land appropriation as hereditary, a little reward for keeping not only the state alive but traditional family model it needs to survive (see quotes 7&8). However, the pirate can not fully escape society any more than the queer. Both are included via their exclusion. 𝑰𝒕 (queerness) repeats because π’Šπ’• (normative law) is necessary for society to preserve itself.
The problem then becomes a matter of reproduction, and as such the normative position of society is necessarily a heteronormative position. The queer/abnormal is essentially othered, defined by what it is not: a normal civilian. And it is not by breaking positivistic law, but by breaking Nomos that the queer is necessarily π’‰π’π’”π’•π’Šπ’” π’ˆπ’†π’π’†π’“π’†π’” π’‰π’–π’Žπ’‚π’π’Š [enemy of the human race]; in the same vein as the pirate under Roman law.
There are some incongruities between their readings of π‘Ήπ’†π’‘π’†π’•π’Šπ’•π’Šπ’π’ and 𝑭𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒅 π‘»π’“π’†π’Žπ’ƒπ’π’Šπ’π’ˆ, but the underlying problematic remains: Sovereign power must repeat via miracle/exception to preserve itself. The problem of the state is existential. 𝑰𝒕 (the commonwealth) repeats because π’Šπ’• (the authors) are temporal. The state can only exist so long as it has subjects to rule over.
My queer pessimism seems to best be explained via both Deleuze and Schmitt's readings of Kierkegaard, and the function spatiality [Ordnung und
Ortung] and Nomos [as normative law] play in the works of Schmitt and Heidegger (this specific post will be focusing on Deleuze & Schmitt *more* than Heidegger). Deleuze & Heidegger here being used as a more ontological framework and Schmitt as a more ontical framework.

test

edit: websites bugging out still atm but yeah kinda for those seeing this adventure unravel: bnuys!!

Can you make threads on this or nah?

Have a theory post in mind but I have 7 photo quotes and posts cap out at 4 :////