It's not just music, either.

I'm talking about music because I was Close to music, and I watched these things play out in real time through lots of little decisions that seemed like the best idea at the time but that ultimately resulted in even our relatively recent scene being full of Empty Space where music should be.

But it's more than music. I've seen indie films at local festivals that, if you weren't in the room at one of those screenings, you'd never know existed. They're ghosts.

I have only my memories of them, and you don't even have that.

Or think about all the *Amazing* artists you knew on Tumblr who have completely disappeared, and taken their archives with them.

How many of those artists still even have copies of all of that work?

And, unlike in years past when, in order for something to stop existing it had to actually be destroyed, today things can just stop existing with the click of a button.

There aren't any physical artifacts tied to their existence.

This is not me railing against digital creation and distribution. Let me make that clear.

I love digital creation and distribution.

I honestly am growing to resent the oppressive size and weight of physical media. (Moving more than 1500 LPs from one building to another, to another, to another, to another 600 miles away, to another, and then back 600 miles again will do that to you.)

But we need to remember that the digital can be ephemeral, and make efforts to preserve our work.

Alright! So that was a rant about the preservation of DIY media. If this is a topic that you find interesting, I've written about it a lot (http://ajroach42.com/we-are-terrible-stewards-of-history/) and pretty much everything else I say is going to touch on this at least in passing.

But I'm moving on from archiving to creating for a minute.

In addition to all of these empty spaces caused by media which was no longer commercially available, there were also empty spaces caused by media which was never created.

Many bands never recorded even a single song.

Bands that everyone loved! Bands that packed houses! Bands that were called "the next thing" by the bands that actually went on to be the next thing!

In 1985 this was almost excusable, except that 4-tracks were affordable and cassette distribution was better than nothing.

Today, there is hardly an excuse.

If you do something creative, music, acting, writing, whatever take the time to preserve it.

The people like me in future generations will thank you.

If you keep waiting until you're "Ready" you might never release anything.

If the thing that is holding you back is financial, then (depending on your medium of choice) there are probably workarounds.

We set up a "recording studio" for $150 and released 6 or 7 albums out of it. Find some like minded folks, and create the scene.

Because in ten years, the only people that stand a chance of being remembered are the ones that we have proof existed.

If you don't write about your favorite local act, will anyone ever know about them?

If your favorite local act never releases a recording, will anyone ever care once they know about them?

What I'm saying here:

If you create things, release them in to the world. Archive them as quickly as you can. Make sure that those things will still exist in ten years.

If you consume things that other people create, Talk About Them in Public Places. Write those blog posts (and put your blog somewhere that it's archives will still be around in ten years.)

Write some damn Zines. Shamelessly promote the things your friends create.

And, when I watched this play out in real time, I saw people frequently choosing not to archive their content in highly public places out of fear that

- It wasn't good enough

or

- People would take it without paying for it.

And I guess either of those things might actually be viable concerns the day that you release the content, but I can't tell you how many of those things that folks decided not to make *too* available are just gone now.

This was 3 years ago! in 3 years, half the local music I listened to regularly disappeared.

And the people who made it, mostly, don't care anymore. They are parents with kids now, or they've moved on to other things.

3 years ago it was really important that no one heard their music that didn't pay for it. Now, you can't even pay for most of it.

So DIY media: Release the things and talk about the things and this is so important.

Print the zines. Release the CDs and the Cassettes, even though it's a pain in the ass. Archive that shit. Give it away. Ask people to pay for it, too, but focus on making something that will last first.

(Because for most artists the problem isn't piracy it's obscurity.)

Now, Keep that DIY media stuff in your head. It's going to come up again.

But first we gotta talk about computers.

Modern computers suck.

They do. They do too much, and they do it too fast, and there are so many layers between the user and the hardware that I can do things like boot up a chrome book, switch to a chroot, launch FreeDOS in qemu, launch VICE or PC64 in Freedos and have an emulated c64 running in an emulated x86 running in a guest OS on a real x86.

And it all mostly works! Except for some weird bugs that only exist because what I'm doing is ridiculous.

Plus we've made so many computers, and written so much software for those computers.

What do I do on Mastodon that I couldn't do on usenet?

How is mastodon different in principal than an evolution of the ideas of usenet?

I love mastodon, don't get me wrong! I think it's a nice incremental evolution over some ideas that we had a long time ago and abandoned for bad reasons in favor of centralized services.

But old software suffers from many of the same problems as other kinds of media but amplified by the fact that floppy disks and HDDs are less durable than the traditional methods through which we've distributed music.

And then there are compatibility issues. And then you get in to cryptography and... well, DOS was never meant to be used for more than 18 months, but I installed it in a VM on my chromebook 30+ years later.

There was a huge DIY software movement back in the 80s and early 90s that hardly exists anymore.

You could say that it has been supplanted by FOSS but you'd be partially right at best

Archive your software. Share your source code. Don't let things you've worked on die.

The internet is not the only way to archive things.

The internet is not the only way to distribute things.

The internet is not eternal. It may not last the rest of our lifetimes. It may be replaced. It may die.

Have a backup plan.

So, when I say computers suck, I don't actually mean that computers suck.

I mostly mean that they change too quickly.

I don't mean that modern software is bad, and old software is good as a rule.

I mean that some modern software is great, and some of it is horrible. And a lot of modern software is no better, or is actually worse, than some old software at the same tasks.

Heck, there are a few scripts that I use literally every day that I wrote myself on a DOS machine when I was 12.

Some of them are still DOS batch files running in DOSEmu, but most of them were eventually ported over to bash or PHP or whatever.

I consider them the same, though, because they still do the same things.

Now, my software that I wrote for my own use isn't archived anywhere other than in nextcloud on my server and on some DVDs and flash drives stashed here and there.

That's Bad! I'm not eating my own dog food.

Some of that is because the software itself is trivial, or because it was never intended for distribution.

A lot of it is because I'm embarrassed to show the world code I wrote when I was 12 (or code that I wrote more recently that looks like it was written by a 12 year old)

So in the spirit of eating my own dog food, I'm going to start (slowly) releasing the software that I write for public consumption.

I'll self host a git repository somewhere, and put together some web pages about it all, and make sure that the binaries and the sources end up in the internet archive with good meta-data because that's the closest thing we have to a good future proof archival solution at the moment.

My blog is already public and archivable. I'll add it to the wayback machine, too.

The handful of computer games I started and never finished will get a final pass for QA and I'll put them up too.

I'm going to eat my own dogfood.

I'm going to upload PDFs of old issues of the AR magazine, too.

That's scary for me because there are lots of things in that that I wrote, or that @CaptainUnderpants wrote and, while they weren't particularly personal at the time, they are very personal in retrospect.

Lots of the people we talk about in those issues no longer talk to us for various silly reasons (and occasionally for some very good reasons.)

Those magazines are very much a product of the time that we wrote them, and largely no longer represent today.

That doesn't preclude them from being useful or valuable.

Most of the content in them is already archived in various places, but the magazines themselves should be (will be) as well.

That takes me through point 4 (DIY media) and point 3 (computers are bad) and touches point 2 (the internet isn't perfect.)

Let's focus on that for a minute.

The internet has problems!

The web also has problems!

The available replacements for the web (Gopher, DAT, IPFS) also have problems!

Let's talk about these things.

When I say the Web has problems, I mostly mean this: https://www.neustadt.fr/essays/against-a-user-hostile-web/

That's a long article, I'll sum up:

- Centralization is bad!
- Everyone is spying on you!
- You are executing arbitrary code every time you load a URL (Even Mastodon//Especially mastodon, although in Mastodon's case that code is open source and publicly audited.)

I'll add to that: most web browsers now have DRM in them, and that makes it illegal to do certain kinds of security research on them in many countries.

When I say the internet has problems, I'm mostly talking about a lot of technical mubojumbo that boils down to a few points:

The people who give us access to the internet don't always have our best interests at heart,

Further, the internet is used by governments as a tool of surveillance, and centralized identities through platforms like Facebook exacerbate this.

Also! Wired infrastructure is almost always owned or operated under exclusive contract by a big 'ol nasty corporation.

Most of the problems with the internet are super technical, or straight up legal issues.

And the solutions to them will be super technical, and also legislative.

The upshot, though, is that the modern internet is less free than it should be, and we should recognize that it can be abused, and have a backup plan in place in the event that something goes wrong with the net.

For me, the backup plan for the internet is a return to the BBS model (I talk about this a lot: http://ajroach42.com/a-modern-bbs/)

Lots of people, especially in urban areas, have been talking about mesh-net ISPs, which are a good idea, with a whole mess of potential problems of their own. Not the least of which is that they will only really work in populus areas.

Right now, as far as I can tell, there isn't a single solution to the problems presented by an unfree internet and a user hostile web.

But there are a bunch of partial solutions.

I cover a lot of these here: http://ajroach42.com/net-neutrality-the-consolidation-of-american-media-and-you/

But I'll sum up.

To fight Centralization:
- Own your data.
- Archive your data online and off.
- Use decentralized services like Mastodon and Matrix and whatever whenever possible.
- publish to places that aren't facebook or medium (and if you must, only use central services for syndication.)

To fight user hostility:
- Use ad blockers and privacy badger
- If you can get away with it, use no-script or similar when possible.
- Stop using, or reduce your use of, platforms that profit from treating you poorly.

@ajroach42 @remotenemesis Everyone's been laid low by Spectre because everyone who makes fast low-power processors use speculative execution.

Isolating for that, Chromebooks are pretty amazingly durable compared to many other options. Doubly so given their general user friendliness.

@Elucidating @remotenemesis I really don't feel like getting in to the weaknesses of chromebooks right now.

They are cheap. That's the best thing they have going for them.

They are surveillance platforms, and IMO that makes them unsafe.

They actively restrict what activities are available to a user (or at least they did until recently with the addition of the play store on many devices) and that makes them user hostile, IMO.

@remotenemesis @Elucidating

They aren't the worst of the bunch, but I wouldn't recommend them for "casual use" and I certainly wouldn't call them "safe"

But that's because computers in general suck right now, and will continue to do so until we stop trying to make them faster and start focusing on making them better.