Compa, free (as freedom) social network decentralized and federated - pump

@kat @alpacaherder From the link, I understand the reasoning, but transferring E14N's servers got caught up in Evan's work schedule, so most of the network nodes have been offline for over a year. At this point, forking seems like an exercise in futility.
Quitter.se

@lnxw48a1 @kat @alpacaherder I don't get the reasoning "people refer to Evan too much in discussions".

It's not because Evan has final say in anything, he has handed over the project. It's just that maybe some of the code needs his feedback because it's not clearly documented or tested. A fork won't resolve that, on the contrary it will just make communication and cooperation more difficult.
@clacke @kat @lnxw48a1 That's the other nasty part.  The forking forkers don't want a benevolent dictator/single maintainer. 
social.heldscal.la

@alpacaherder @kat @lnxw48a1 Nobody insists on having a benevolent dictator. strugee is just the only person willing to take responsibility for the code base. Have they even asked him for the commit bit?

I'm not super angry about them forking, it just seems counterproductive. Everything they want to do is already registered as issues on the mother project, they could just start solving them. Now there are two places to track issues.
@clacke @kat @lnxw48a1 They're looking at the problems other than ActivityPub as "easy".  I'm worried they're going to have a dumpster fire.
social.heldscal.la