Sarah ☭Jun 17, 2017

Hey don't put content warnings for things like "homosexuality mention" or "sex worker mention" just mentioning we exist shouldn't be put behind a content warning. That's incredibly dehumanizing.

Good CWs would be along the lines of "homophobia example" or "anti-sex worker discourse" where you're warning about things that could trigger/upset gay ppl or sex workers. Sex workers existing and being ppl isn't triggering unless you're a shitty person. Sorry but I saw a CW for "sex worker mention" :/

Show threadSarah ☭Jun 17, 2017
If you're wondering whether to put a CW for NSFW content on a post involving oppressed or marginalized ppl, just ask yourself if it would still warrant that CW if it were involving only Cis hets and civilians etc. It's not *more* NSFW for involving sex workers or LGBT ppl. Js
Show threadcyb3rmikeJun 17, 2017

.@TransCommunist I'm on ur side that most people like that are shitty persons. But can I say I am not? And is this a good reason to deny them filter souvereignty?

I once walked with a friend, and we accidentally passed through the redlight district. she was horrified (without knowing why ofc). She is a communist, but not very sensitive to feminism or to her own migrant patriotism, so hard to judge if she is a shitty person.

I think she deserves to judge if she wants to see sex work mentions.

Show threadSarah ☭
@b3yond nah
Jun 17, 2017 at 8:12amAmaroq