@robparsons @friedelitis @katebowles @mahabali @lauraritchie @fgraver @clhendricksbc
Navel gazing is the only way to find out if you have trapped lint there (someone has to take the other side).
@lauraritchie @cogdog @friedelitis @mahabali @fgraver @clhendricksbc @robparsons Indigenous researchers emphasise that practice is always relational: who am I, that I am not you? How are we connected? How did we each come to this point, through lines of kin and relationships to place?
For non-Indigenous researchers this is a reminder that we each came to this point where the world looks obvious to us, and that's how our lenses were shaped.
Reflexivity is core to this.
2c
@friedelitis @mahabali @cogdog @lauraritchie @fgraver @clhendricksbc @robparsons
So for me there's a colonialist logic to the dismissal of reflection as navel gazing. Reflection on self and practice can't detour around questions of power, and these are awkward questions for power itself.
So there's an effort to trivialise and dismiss reflection, that's worth keeping an eye on.
Hope this helps, Maha. Why did you ask?
I cannot remember now why I asked re navel-gazing but I do think what you both said re negative connotation and colonialist assumptions are what I was trying to get at
And that positionality of researcher and her self-reflection are essential to any research also... But that I felt the term navel-gazing was more of an attempt to dismiss self-reflective/reflexive research as less valuable...
@Professorsv @friedelitis @katebowles @cogdog @lauraritchie @fgraver @clhendricksbc @robparsons