@dredmorbius The challenge will be *finding* people across instances - and knowing which address is the "right" one. It is the issue with email. How do you know which email address to use for me? "Dan York" is a pretty generic name and there are a lot of us. Which one is me?

I do think one of the drives toward centralization was this "directory dilemma". I do it myself - I don't know which email to use for someone, so I send them a direct message via FB or Twitter.

@danyork I'm also starting to wonder if we're not confounding "what is your identity" with "how can I direct a message /to/ you" and "how can I determine a message is /from/ you". These are ... subtly different.

Reputation is another huge factor. Payments-oriented questions, and rights-oriented questions, would be additional dimensions.

We're in a world of usernames and passwords in large part because those are the models computers find easier. They may not fit the world.

@dredmorbius Right. Those are nuances in "identity" that are important.

@danyork Crazy thing: I've been dealing with this stuff for 3-4 decades, and I'm only starting to think about it in these terms.

I don't know if I'm slow or if the problem is harder than most people realise.

@dredmorbius @danyork It's also relevant to the discussion about the blockchain, I think. I am following some (competent) blockchain critics on Twitter, and they keep pointing out how difficult "identity" is.
@stefanieschulte @dredmorbius Agreed. Blockchain can certainly be a tool in helping assert "ownership" (by the logging in the distributed ledger) but identity is a larger topic.
@danyork @dredmorbius I think this is a good explanation of the limits of the blockchain, especially with regards to identity management: https://theconversation.com/blockchain-really-only-does-one-thing-well-62668