when people are giving Haskell talks, i really wish they wouldn't try to describe type signatures without displaying the type signatures. like i'm closing my eyes, trying to visualize all the "m of a" that you're talking about but uh.
@argumatronic : The scariest thing is Kmett talking of types. I mean, you'd think he's just listing stuff he's going to buy at the supermarket. It seems so natural to him. He scares me. I feel the tinyness of my brain.
@argumatronic Agreed 100%. I also have issues with function composition (f of g of h...) and infix functions like >>= or <*>. Just show code.

@Xavier @argumatronic I find pronouncing function composition ( g .f or g <<< f) as "g after f" to be much easier to follow in my head

I haven't seen anyone do this but pronouncing (>>>) as "then" or "before" would probably be similarly helpful