when people are giving Haskell talks, i really wish they wouldn't try to describe type signatures without displaying the type signatures. like i'm closing my eyes, trying to visualize all the "m of a" that you're talking about but uh.
@Xavier @argumatronic I find pronouncing function composition ( g .f or g <<< f) as "g after f" to be much easier to follow in my head
I haven't seen anyone do this but pronouncing (>>>) as "then" or "before" would probably be similarly helpful