Funny how religious people can say anything to your face but any retort back is religious prosecution
Funny how religious people can say anything to your face but any retort back is religious prosecution
God loves you unconditionally, under no conditions
Calling God a “man in the clouds” is like calling a puppy a “bag of meat, raw flesh and blood”
God loves you unconditionally, under no conditions
Sure, He loves you so much that He must torture you for all eternity for not letting Him into your heart (or cursing His Magic Bird, of course, that goes without saying)*
*only applicable to Bible God, your God(s) may differ
Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is rejecting God until death.
Hell is just the abyss, non existence and we know VERY little about it, dantes inferno is a blatant fanfic
There is no god, no heaven, no devil, no hell, no angels, no demons.
Unless you think these gods are also real:
Achilles, Adapa, Aeneas, Allah, Ame-no-minaka-nushi, An, Anšar, Antu, Anubis, Anzû, Aphrodite, Apollo, Apsu, Areop-Enap, Ares, Artemis, Asag, Asclepius, Aššur, Athena, Atiya Kuru Shidaba, Atra-Hasīs, Atum, Âu Cơ, Awonawilona, Baal, Baldur, Bau, Beowulf, Bes, Buga, Bull of Heaven, Buninka, Cronus, Dangun, Dâyuni’sï, Demeter, Dionysus, Dumuzi, Enki, Enkidu, Enlil, Ereškigal, Esege Malan, Freya, Freyr, Gaia, Geb, Gichi-manidoo, Gilgameš, Grendel, Hades, Hathor, Hephaestus, Hera, Heracles, Hercules, Hermes, Hine-nui-te-pō, Horus, Hwanin, Hwanung, Inanna, Ishtar, Isis, Käng, Kamui, Kāne, Khnum, Ki, Kišar, Kūkaʻilimoku, Kukulkan, Lạc Long Quân, Lahamu, Lahmu, Loki, Lono, Ma, Mahavira, Marduk, Montu, Nabû, Nammu, Nephthys, Nergal, Neti, Ninḫursaĝ, Ninlil, Ninurta, Nisroch, Nusku.
?
There is no SCIENCE, no SCIENTIFIC METHOD,
unless you think these theories are also valid:
Flat Earth Theory, Fake Bird Drones Theory, Covid Bioweapon Theory,
?
Yes, they are theories. They are also testable.
Your imaginary gods that don’t exist and have never shown even a neutrino’s worth of evidence.
Has any prayer ever regrown a severed fingertip? Ever?
?
This is what amounts to a micdrop for you, is it? A link to one paragraph that provides no proof whatsoever, but instead claims said proof both exists and is beyond dismissal?
Pathetic.
How the Healing Was Confirmed
The diocesan tribunal investigated the case. The Vatican’s Congregation for the Causes of Saints reviewed the maternal-fetal medical records and comparative ultrasound imaging. Pope Francis approved the miracle decree in May 2020.
Understanding the Illness
Fetal hydrops (hydrops fetalis) is a severe condition in which abnormal amounts of fluid accumulate in the fetus’s tissues and organs—around the heart, lungs, abdomen, or under the skin. It is usually fatal, with survival rates under 10% even with intensive treatment. Spontaneous resolution in utero is medically unprecedented.
Full Narrative
Blessed Michael McGivney (1852–1890) founded the Knights of Columbus. In February 2015, Michelle Schachle’s unborn son was diagnosed with hydrops fetalis—a usually fatal accumulation of fluid in the fetus’s tissues and organs—plus Down syndrome. Doctors gave zero chance of survival and encouraged abortion. Daniel and Michelle Schachle refused and prayed to Fr. McGivney. Daniel promised to name the boy Michael if healed.
The documentation. The healing of fatal fetal hydrops in utero is supported by comparative pre- and post-healing ultrasound imaging and maternal-fetal medical records. The before-and-after imaging provides objective evidence that the condition—which is typically fatal—completely resolved without medical intervention. Mikey was born healthy and continues to thrive today.
Pope Francis approved the miracle in May 2020; McGivney was beatified October 31, 2020. The Knights of Columbus (kofc.org) and Catholic News Agency document the case.
Why It Matters
Fetal hydrops is typically fatal. The comparative pre- and post-healing ultrasound imaging provides objective, verifiable evidence. McGivney founded the Knights of Columbus—a major American Catholic organization. The case is exceptionally well-documented by modern maternal-fetal medicine standards.
blah blah blah no evidence actually provided blah blah blah trust me, bro!
I did read it initially - that’s how I know they didn’t provide any evidence. If they had it, they probably would have mentioned it.
Wow, so there’s no evidence! Isn’t that exactly what I just said?
If this was, you know, proof of a miracle… well, if it had been you, you’d probably consent to it’s release, wouldn’t you? I mean it would be a bit of a dick move to hide incontrovertible proof of a miracle and thereby the existance of god from the world, right?
Really weird how they apparently disagree with you.
there are thousands of documented miracles in the Catholic Church
let me give you another one
Marie Bailly, 23, was dying of acute tubercular peritonitis. Her father, mother, and one brother had all died of tuberculosis. Her abdomen was massively distended with hard tubercular masses and fluid. She was in a semi-coma with a racing pulse, blue complexion, and labored breathing.
Dr. Alexis Carrel — a brilliant, agnostic French surgeon — accompanied sick pilgrims on the “White Train” to Lourdes, partly out of scientific curiosity. He examined Bailly on the train and concluded she was near death.
The Witness
Carrel was standing over Bailly at the Grotto with his notebook. As water from the Lourdes spring was applied to her abdomen, he documented what happened minute by minute:
Bailly said: “All right. I am not very energetic, but I feel that I am healed.” She ate dinner that evening and walked the next morning.
this one was verified by her agnostic doctor who won the nobel prize in medicine later
Nice so there’s medical records available for this one? Given it was in 1902 that seems unlikely they’d be very useful, but they are available right?
He is known for his leading role in implementing eugenic policies in Vichy France.
Man, I really sure do think we should be taking this guy at his word! He sounds like a great person and it’s not embarassing at all that you’re resorting to citing cases put forward by fucking nazi collaborators as real hard evidence!
On August 15, 1996, a discarded consecrated Host was placed in water according to standard protocol. Instead of dissolving, it developed reddish tissue and grew.
The Witness
Zugibe analyzed the tissue and identified it as human heart muscle — specifically from the myocardium of the left ventricle near the heart valves.
When Zugibe was finally told the sample came from a communion wafer that had been sitting in water for three years, he stated: “How and why a piece of a human heart is still alive, sitting in distilled water, is totally beyond my comprehension.”
okay, heres another one
For living white blood cells to be present in heart muscle from a Host that had been in water for three years defies the known laws of biology. The tissue showed no decomposition. The sample was submitted blind to a secular forensic scientist who had no theological investment in the result.
The Skeptic’s Rebuttal
Skeptics raise two objections. First, they invoke Serratia marcescens — a common red-pigmented bacterium that thrives in damp environments like a wafer in water, and has been blamed for nearly every “bleeding host” in history. Second, they attack the chain of custody: the sample sat in a jar in Argentina for three years before being sent to New York. A skeptic will say: "I don’t doubt Dr. Zugibe analyzed human heart tissue. I doubt that the heart tissue was ever a piece of bread. Someone swapped it."
The Forensic Counter-Argument
The *Serratia* argument collapses under scrutiny. *Serratia marcescens* produces a surface-level red pigment on bread. It is a smear of bacteria. It does not produce organized, striated human myocardial tissue with identifiable actin, myosin, intercalated discs, and active immune cells.
@IAMgROOT @Warl0k3
In my long experience encouraging and observing dialogue between Christians and atheists, I've reached the conclusion that both sides come to the table with completely contradictory worldviews.
Reconciliation is, therefore, virtually impossible. The most you can hope to accomplish is some degree of mutual understanding and appreciation for the simple fact of each other's essential humanity.
Good luck.
@Warl0k3
No offense meant! LOL, the president of American Atheists called me an "Uncle Tom atheist" when we were on a panel together, years ago. I understand the appeal of convincing the opposition (on both sides), but in long years of watching these conversations I've NEVER seen anyone convince anyone else.
The most I've seen is for people to understand that the people on the other side are just that: people. I think that's a positive step.
Wait, Nick Fish? Comically in character if so.
I wholeheartedly agree with the overall futility of trying to change someone’s opinions thru internet bickering - so to be honest I’m not even trying, I’m just entertaining myself while wasting their time. They’re transparently not here in good faith (rimshot) so why even bother pretending like they are…
@Warl0k3
I know! Ironically some of the leaders of the convention we spoke at were harassing and molesting women at the con. Turned out that the rest of the con staff were covering it up.
Talk about Original Sin! 🤣
@Warl0k3
Oh, that's a WHOLE can of worms! 🤣
The original Boston convention (actually New England) was Boskone, named after the planet of evil masterminds from the Lensmen series. It ended up developing the problems that most successful cons of the time had; too many attendees, lots of them young and looking for alcohol and sex (which they found). Result: lots of salacious stories in the news about the science fiction sexathon freaks, Right Here In Our City!
Also the usual chaos; people foaming the hotel hallways with fire extinguishers and doing high speed sledding, pulling multiple fire alarms over the weekend, drunken orgies, etc. Boston hotels basically decided as a group to no longer host science fiction conventions.
It was a fun con, by all accounts. But the people at the top (Boskone was a fan-run con, as all good cons are) finally had enough. They moved the con out of Boston (I think it was once held in Springfield, which is as far away from Boston as you could get and still remain in Massachusetts) and clamped down HARD. No cosplay. No parties. No alcohol. NO FUN OF ANY KIND!
Also they instituted a strict membership cap.
The result was an extreme reduction in the size and popularity of Boskone.
Years passed. A group of younger fans decided to start a Boston con for general science fiction and fantasy. They named it "Arisia", after the secret planet of •good• masterminds from the Lensmen series (a little jab at Boskone, which still exists to this day in diminished form). They found a hotel in Boston's financial district that was willing to host. And so the first Arisia was held in 1990.
That was my first con, by the way. A friend got me to go. It blew my mind. We entered the amateur video contest that year and won first place.
I attended the con faithfully for the next 25 or 27 years. Became a panelist there early on, and did hundreds of panels (no exaggeration). Taught origami classes to young kids several times. Read books to kids. Helped a friend with some prize-winning costumes at the big costume competitions. Helped my young son make cosplay costumes; they made him the regular closer of the kids' part of the show. Had a lot of amazing adventures.
But nothing lasts forever. A new group of young insiders took over, and they had big plans. Bathrooms would be unisex. Gluten would be banned. The old guard would be eliminated. Older, experienced panelists would be excluded. Topics that offended their refined sensibilities would be forbidden; for example, an outstanding series of events for dialog between theists and atheists was cancelled because "only straight white guys are atheists" (which was absolutely untrue; the audience and panelists were among the most diverse I saw in my whole time at the Con).
Within a few years, everyone I knew had either been banned or chose to no longer attend or serve as staff. The number of annual attendees crashed from nearly 5,00 to under1,000. It also came out that some of the new leaders had been harassing and r@ping some of the attendees and lower-level staff, but that was covered up by the Con Committee for years.
I was one of the banned. My crime was wearing a costume that included a latex balloon, although that wasn't forbidden. I also committed the signal offense of talking about the changes the leadership had made online, which I was told was absolutely unforgivable.
#Arisia #Convention #cons #ScienceFiction #Boskone #atheism #atheists