The big story emerging from yesterday's primary results is that Progressive Dems are winning everywhere by big margins over their establishment Corporate Dem opponents. #WeThePeople are taking over the Democratic Party.

How to spot the difference:

Takes money from AIPAC, AI and Crypto PACs >>> CorpDem
Supported by Schumer, Jeffries >>> CorpDem

Refuses to take money from AIPAC, AI and Crypto PACs >>> ProgDem
Supported by Mamdani, Pritzker, Warren, Sanders, AOC >>> ProgDem

#ProgressiveDemocrat

@mastodonmigration Unfortunately, presidential elections are always determined by independents in the middle, who are not inclined to vote for what they view as candidates at the far end. For example, polls showed that the entire complex of issues around sexuality and sports was an enormous turn-off for the middle, and pushed them enough toward Trump to make the difference. That's just the unfortunate reality. Middle of the road, safe candidates usually win, except in extraordinary circumstances (e.g., Biden's obvious denial of a steep mental decline). Remember, Trump won't be running again (no matter what he says).

@lauren

We will see. The conventional wisdom is always true until it is not.

@mastodonmigration This one has been 100%. The presidential elections history is littered with examples. You probably know them as well as I do.

@lauren

The question however becomes what is 'moderate' when the Overton window has shifted so far. Is it moderate to support bills favoring corporate Ponzi schemes over regular investors retirement savings? Is it moderate to support war in Gaza and Lebanon? When the establishment Democrats have become captive of big money, what defines moderate? If you listen to Brad Lander he actually sounds like the real moderate. What is happening is a definition of what constitutes 'the middle.'

@mastodonmigration I think the key aspect is that overwhelmingly the factor driving Trump's polling decline is the economy. Everything else, even health care (which of course relates) is much further down. Whoever is seen as most likely to keep the price of gasoline down is most likely to win.
@lauren @mastodonmigration Heh, so the Dems should consider a one-line platform: “We promise not to start any wars”.
@timbray @mastodonmigration They have to go after the foundational pocketbook stuff. Not massive proposals unlikely to be enacted and survive court challenges. The reason the price of gas is such a flash point is that most people have to deal with it on a daily basis, and those prices are up there on the signs that everyone sees.
@timbray So, you're saying that the Dems should promise the same thing that Trump promised (“I’m not going to start a war; I’m going to stop wars”) and then reneged on? (In a poll, 48% of adults believe Republican politicians are "sometimes or always dishonest," while 44% say the same about Democrats.)
@lauren @mastodonmigration
@PeterLudemann @timbray @lauren @mastodonmigration
Even just claiming they would stop wars would be an improvement over, um, well - beating up and deporting people who opposed genocide, for example