RE: https://macaw.social/@andypiper/116779034163070932

There was a period of time if you encouraged people to leave Twitter they'd tell you that this is why people don't leave Twitter.

(For some reason the boosted nazis and shadow-banned/deplatformed antifas aren't reason enough to leave)

Andy Piper (@[email protected])

This is way, way too long in even *starting* to happen. The writing has been on the wall ever since Twitter was sold. X is anti-govt, anti-people, and no-one should believe that they have "an audience" there. It's a megaphone for hatred. I'll just note that I wrote this almost 2 years ago. https://andypiper.co.uk/2024/08/15/fediverse-for-freedom/

Macaw-Social

I think the reason to leave is even simpler:

The game is rigged.

Once shitface decided to weigh the algorithm to give him and his shithead nazi friends +1000 'posty points' (or by whatever arcane process the system decides whether you're allowed to see posts or not), your "stay and fight" was a bit like being a Cavuto on Fox: you're there as a 'liberal' to be a punching bag and a target.

But even worse: to provide the illusion of balance.

My challenge to people who claim that "Mastodon is too complicated."

Okay, fine.

Explain the process by which X decides which posts get seen or not seen by people who follow someone.

Meanwhile, on the fediverse: You post shit, your followers see it in their Home feed.

That's it.

Or as I'm fond of saying:

It works on Mastodon/the fedi the way you think it should work on X.

When you don't need to reach some required 'engagement level' for a post to push it to your followers, all the performative "influencing" literally generated by the arcane rules of engagement, suddenly becomes completely unnecessary.

As such, when people forced into that song and dance come here, they stand out for a little while.

Fine, let's consider Bluesky.

Bluesky does have a "Following" feed which I can only assume works identical to the fediverse, and it just shows a chronological feed of every person you follow.

I'll assume that because anything else would be ridiculous.

But then...there's this shit.

See that 'Time spent viewing'?

That means they are tracking page views. That's also the basis of tracking your eyeballs, your clicks, and selling that to advertisers.

No fedi software I'm aware of (Loops perhaps?) has even remotely the ability to track what you clicked on, how long you viewed it, or any other invasive fuckery like that.

I literally don't know how much time you spent viewing my posts because I can't.

I don't know if you clicked on one of my links or not, there's no analytics tracking my 'post performance' or some such.

Great for privacy, but of negative value to advertisers.

To be clear, advertisers want to know how many 'impressions' their ads got, how many people saw their post/ad, how many clicked. That's just baseline, and requires a certain amount of client-side tracking to provide that data.

FollowBlue helps you build a genuine following on Bluesky with smart, automated growth strategies that feel natural.

If you expand that content warning to view the boobies on the fediverse, I guarantee you no one knows you did it.

But on Bluesky, X, and Threads: they all know you looked, and have added it to your profile.

@oli there are boobies on the fediverse? when did that start happening?
@avatastic @oli there’s no way to truly tell, and I think that’s beautiful
@avatastic @oli depends on when they started E
@avatastic @oli I've been told there are bobbies here. ie. Brit cops with their quaint little truncheons