Today, after a ton of work, we publish our Recommendations When Using LLM-backed Generative AI Systems for FOSS Contributions, which reflect the extremely difficult dilemmas that these systems pose for FOSS contributors. We're approaching LLM-gen-AI from a variety of perspectives and this is practical assistance to minimize damage caused by using proprietary systems, whether FOSS contributors reject LLM-gen-AI or choose (voluntarily or by employer mandate) to use them.

https://sfconservancy.org/llm-gen-ai/llm-backed-generative-ai-recommendations.html
LLM-gen-AI - Software Freedom Conservancy

The Software Freedom Conservancy provides a non-profit home and services to Free, Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects.

@conservancy if a prospective contributor's employer requires them to use LLMs to create their patch, it should be rejected just like any other patch which is not released under a compatible license, fails code review, or is otherwise deemed not suitable for merging.

This is not complicated.

@conservancy (and if this means rejecting contributions from mozilla or red hat or canonical until they change their policies, that's their problem)