@marick
I cannot locate the origin of this quote. But I can verify this quote by Lyndon B. Johnson:
"I'll tell you what's at the bottom of it. If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/lbj-convince-the-lowest-white-man/
@qole @marick pretty sure it was a commenter on balloon-juice.com
got it back to 2009 without much effort (see also crazification factor)
https://balloon-juice.com/2009/10/07/open-thread-lagging-lexicon-indicators/

WordPress still won’t let me change so much as a misplaced comma in the Lexicon. Actually, WordPress is only allowing me to read the site about 60% of the time this week, just in case anybody thought the secondary front-pagers got some kind of special access. Either the Red State Trike Farce Strike Force is …
@qole @marick agreed and that's annoying - I was (and still am!) lurking on BJ through those years and I remember the comment but doesn't seem to be linked anywhere. I'm going to poke around a bit
crazification factor is from 2005 so that limits it to 5 years or so of posts....
oh dear
this is going to be in some ways worse than that "exactly 2 propositions, an in group that the law protects but doesn't bind and an out-group who the law binds but does not protect" quote (mangled here for sure)

This is Wilhoit's Law in action: > Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. https://t.co/xwoeNFK06P 36/
@sabik @qole @marick @pluralistic right?? well known poliitical scientist Francis (Frank) Wilhoit did not formulate Wilhoit's Law
It was a completely different Frank Wilhoit who did it, on Crooked Timber back in 2018
and this one I have found the cite for - original is here
https://crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/liberals-against-progressives/#comment-729288
Slate did a piece on it as well.
https://slate.com/business/2022/06/wilhoits-law-conservatives-frank-wilhoit.html
@sabik @qole @offbyone @marick @pluralistic
“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:
There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind,
alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.
There is nothing more or else to it,
and there never has been."
~Frank Wilhoit, composer
https://crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/liberals-against-progressives/#comment-729288
@qole @offbyone @pluralistic I personally believe that “conservatism is about maintaining supposedly-natural hierarchies” is more plausible than that conservatism is about property.
But the word is an “essentially contested concept,” which to me means definitional discussions have low expected value compared to action-oriented discussions.
https://blog.oddly-influenced.dev/2025/10/14/essentially-contested-concepts-a-catchy.html

What does it mean to be a good Christian? How do you decide whether something someone made is art or not art? If you say you’re practicing Agile software development, and I say you’re not – that you’re missing the point – where do we go from there? The answer to the last question, in my experience, is: nowhere, and fast. But we don’t have that problem with questions like “is that tree an elm?” or “is light a particle or a wave?” Why not?